Alan Jones’ former advertisers should ‘get shit’ if they sneak back to 2GB: IAA panel
Marc Fennell from SBS’ The Feed has said the media needs to hold brands to account if they return their advertising dollars to the Alan Jones Breakfast Show on 2GB.
Since Jones said Prime Minister Scott Morrison should shove a sock down Jacinda Ardern’s throat and get “tough here with a few backhanders”, 29 advertisers have pulled out of 2GB’s dominant breakfast slot. Whether those advertisers stand behind their decision and stay off 2GB’s airwaves is a different story, and one that needs to be watched, said Fennell.
“This comes down to sustainability to a degree … The problem with this particular mechanism is that it is short term, you get your name on a list of brands that have pulled out, you can crow about it on social media,” Fennell said, speaking on an International Advertising Association panel last night.
“I really would like to see some dedicated media reporter paying attention and calling out the exact day when those brands go back, because when they can be shamed for that, when they have to cop the negative to go with the positive, then you will see, perhaps, a more consistent behaviour from those brands,” he said.
“If you can identify that moment, and make sure that that brand is being held to account. If you got your social media bump for pulling out, and you go back, you should get shit for that.”
Fellow panellists agreed that advertisers are likely to sidle up to 2GB again. Jones himself said this week that advertisers “can make their own judgment – but they go, there will be others to take their place”.
“I think you can pull out and at some point you do flip in again because it’s a commercial reality, it’s a high-rating breakfast radio show. If that’s the target you need to reach, at some point you’re like, ‘Okay I’ve sent the signal, I’ve pulled the money out because I don’t want you to behave like this’. You have a meeting with Macquarie [Media, the owner of 2GB] and have that conversation with them, and at some point you’re like ‘Okay we’re going back in again’,” Jarther Taylor, KPMG’s marketing director, explained.
“I don’t know the answer. I think it’s sort of one of those things that it kind of all needs to come together. He needs to just go against the right person, or the wrong person, at the wrong time, the wrong way for it all to come together. And a number of brands who happen to be investing heavily pulling out at that moment. And he’s in the middle of negotiating, or something else going on, and that’s when it sort of falls over.”
TBWA’s Ricci Meldrum added that advertisers withdrawing support is “commercial punishment”, a way to question how Macquarie is controlling its talent and a prompt for Macquarie to question Jones.
“I think the challenge is that it’s happened too often,” Meldrum said.
However, Helen Merrick, ANZ’s marketing lead in the everyday banking space, noted that flipping support on and off is “a little bit the nature of advertising”, noting that while “it’s a bit shameful and brands shouldn’t do it”, it happens, and will continue happening, including in the realm of sponsorships.
“As a sponsor, which is not quite the same as an advertiser, but let’s talk about a sponsorship arrangement that you’ve maybe signed for three years or five years, that you have invested, as a brand, a tremendous amount of blood, sweat and tears into,” Merrick said.
“You’ve probably, maybe, got deep communities, activations around the headline sponsorship. Let’s imagine, a very senior person at a very high-profile, global football organisation does something very bad and you’re involved with sponsorship, for example. It’s a bloody difficult thing to unstitch and at the point where you decide you’re going to, certainly in a sponsor relationship, that’s a huge moment. Financially. Practically. Strategically.”
The panel acknowledged Macquarie Media chairperson Russell Tate’s statement, in which he said that should Jones make similar comments again, his contract will be terminated. The issue is, hasn’t Jones had enough chances already, they questioned.
“Well, really? Haven’t we had a bunch of strikes already?” Taylor said.
“He incited a race riot,” Fennell added. “Like, come on.”
But Meldrum is optimistic. Perhaps we’ve reached a level of cultural maturity that means Jones’ latest comments irreparably, rather than temporarily, damage his brand, and therefore damage 2GB?
“It does feel, in some ways, like we’re on a little bit of a tipping point, with Alan Jones,” she said.
“I’m hoping…”
I won’t be buying from any of those ex advertisers. Stick to business and stop trying to be moral advocators.
User ID not verified.
Pete – aren’t you being a moral advocate by boycotting the ex-advertisers?
User ID not verified.
All good providing it applies to all media .
EG: Facebook because they live stream mass murders don’t they ?
Mind you they sponsored the event so guessing they will be exempt form the discussion
User ID not verified.
this Groupthink on this panel shows once again that the ad and marketing industries are populated in the main from from an inner city progressive demographic that does not reflect or represent large swathes of the Australian population
User ID not verified.
Good on ya Petey. Just like those advertisers, you are free to do whatever aligns to your values. If they come back to advertise, they are hypocrites… just make sure you never buy from them again too eh?
User ID not verified.
Hi Davey, I’ve checked them out and they’re definitely not irreplaceable. Thanks for the support and the sarcasm.
User ID not verified.
Don’t think it’s exclusively progressive to have an issue with the language Jones used ? Are you suggesting that the majority of Australians have no issue with how he talks about women ?
User ID not verified.
I think he talks to/about everyone he disagrees with like that. People always raise his treatment of Gillard as proof of sexism but if we were played recordings of all the stuff he said about Kevin Rudd or Malcolm Turnbull I’m sure we’d find a load of similar examples.
Hyperbole and overstatement is a tool of the trade…and he’s particularly good at it.
I do think this particular phrase has cut through with a broader cross section of the population, hence his apology but I also think it’s only the Progressive demographic who are mobilising…and while they’d never admit it, in my opinion it’s got more to do with his overall politics and their desire to take down an ‘enemy’ than the dangers of this particular phrase
User ID not verified.
@ fleshpeddler after all these years surely you’ve noticed the ad industry is made up of intelligent educated people not knuckle draggers
User ID not verified.
Maybe Holeproof socks could fill the gap. They’ve one hell of an endorser…
User ID not verified.
Yep – I’m a moral advocate for free speech.
User ID not verified.
what about the the bullies, mysoginists, avaricious and sexual predators we read about on here?
User ID not verified.
Agree 100%
User ID not verified.
They’re the few Jones supporters.
User ID not verified.
https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/media/we-will-continue-to-represent-men-at-their-best-gillettes-backflip-after-toxic-masculinity-backlash/news-story/8ae70a5abc31280fc23711dcf7c30e5e
User ID not verified.
The suggestion that boycotts are “a way to question how Macquarie is controlling its talent” are interesting.
Much of the outspoken Left who are advocating for this are the same ones convinced that Rupert Murdoch personally whispers in the ear of every News Corp journalist telling them what to say. He doesn’t, of course but it’s interesting how they have a flexible set of moral standards depending on who is speaking.
I can guarantee that had Jon Faine or Philip Adams said word for word what Alan said, we wouldn’t be having this conversation at all.
User ID not verified.
Accounting form Kelly+Partners has also stopped their advertising with AJ.
User ID not verified.