Opinion

Deep or wide? The existential question for business media

tim burrowes landscapeB2B publishers face an imminent choice, argues Mumbrella’s Tim Burrowes. Should they chase a programmatic strategy, or should they double down on the width of their offering? 

I wonder if fans of independent publishing will look back upon the last decade as the final golden age of independent media.

After two days hearing from some of the biggest players in B2B, I now think that’s at least a possibility.

Last week saw the first B2B Media Strategies conference in London. It featured executives from many of the world’s biggest business publishers sharing their own lessons and strategies. And while they didn’t supply all the answers (these type of conferences never do), they certainly refocused the questions.

One of the most compelling presentations of the event came from Michael Friedenberg, CEO of the US-based IDG Communications (the people behind the likes of CIO and PC World).

The picture he drew was unlike your typical B2B publishing company.

The future (and near present) in IDGland is entirely programmatic.

The key to success in that environment is being able to generate comprehensive first person data about who your audience is, and the types of decisions they are making, then sell access to those people to advertisers at the key moment.

And to go a step further – by selling access to that audience not just on your own sites, but across the web.

This means being in the arbitrage business – buying impressions at a CPM of $2 and selling them on at $25 or more. Friedenberg revealed that by setting up its own trading desk, this has given IDG access to 1.2bn impressions per month.

F

Friedenberg: Move to programmatic is inevitable for B2B

It’s a daunting prospect for your average B2B publisher, of whom a not-insignificant proportion is still getting to grips with a basic web strategy, let alone programmatic. Developing an in-house programmatic strategy will seem a long way off for many, as will knowing where to begin in building a wider, brand safe network.

Suddenly, the future looks like a place where publishers will once again need scale.

Which is why I say we may look back on the decade as the last golden age.

Digital brought about cheap distribution for independent players. (No need to mortgage the house to get the first edition printed when you can chuck up a WordPress site for nothing.)

Digital brought about cheap email distribution for independent players. (No need to take out a second mortgage to post out that first edition.)

And digital brought about amplification and relevance through social media.

Now though, it’s all starting to look like the hack-in-a-garage model may be ending, and it could be a big boys’ game again.

That’s if you buy the IDG world view. As Friedenberg puts it: “It’s going to happen in B2B. I promise you.”

But what if most of your readers aren’t making high value business decisions? Or what if you can’t identify them? Can you instead go on persuading advertisers that if they talk to your audience en masse, they’ll get a return on their adspend?

For a long time, I suspect you will. Particularly for that majority of B2B publishers who unlike IDG aren’t already talking to the tech space.

However, you’d be crazy not to already be working out how to maximise and connect what you know about your audience.

If you are one of those B2B publishers, how much do you know about the people who subscribe to your news emails? Do you systematically link that info to their behaviour surfing your site, or attending your events?

I confess, at Mumbrella we don’t yet. But it suddenly feels a bit more urgent. (And that means also taking your audience with you on the privacy implications.)

But there is a counter argument, by the way, that the future of B2B lies in being a specialist with a full spectrum of products, and that success actually lies in learning lessons from the past. Particularly if you have an audience that’s got budgets to buy that info.

As we’ve reported, Colin Morrison argued that one of the biggest mistakes business publishers made was getting lazy about the depth of information they needed to provide during the ad boom of the 80s and 90s. As you may have heard, data is back.

Centaur Publishing’s reinvigoration of its subscription data products (those things that used to be known as directories) was another convincing case study. Thanks to digital, directories have gone from the most boring thing in the portfolio to the most exciting, argued Centaur’s Simon Middelboe.

And the same event heard the turnaround story of Travel Trade Gazette in the UK, or TTG Media, as it is now. It was a success story – but it was also simply the very traditional B2B model, well executed. Publish a good mag, have a good sales team, run conferences and awards, build momentum and do everything well.

And the conference was presented with plenty of evidence that there is still much success to be had from the face-to-face side of the industry – conferences and expos.

But it was also clear that there are very few publishers globally who are good at everything – from expos to websites, to conferences, to mags, to data products.

Those who know how to put on a 3,000 person trade show rarely publish a great website. And vice versa.

It feels though, like it’s time for those in B2B to make a bet. Are you going to get deep into the technology (or find somebody to work with who is)? Or are you going to go wide in how you deliver services to your niche?

  • Tim Burrowes is content director and founder of Mumbrella
ADVERTISEMENT

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing