New Google boss calls for collaboration on cross-screen measurement as attacks on digital arise
Google Australia boss Jason Pellegrino has called for media and digital companies to work more closely to provide cross-platform measurement, as the tide of digital doubters increases.
Recent months have seen the likes of academic Mark Ritson, Ad Contrarian Bob Hoffman, and last week, marketing consultant and author Peter Field, join a chorus of voices questioning the amount of money marketing executives are throwing at digital channels, while apparently abandoning what they call proven platforms delivering predictable mass media audiences capable of building brands.
In his first public comments since taking the top job at Google Australia and New Zealand, Pellegrino wrote in The Australian that while there was an industry pre-occupation with the platforms, consumers were just interested in the content and that there needed to be industry collaboration on measurement.
Pellegrino told Mumbrella the pace of change was so fast it needed to be addressed by all players.
“Consumer behaviour has evolved and is continuing to evolve so quickly we need to make sure that measurement reflects this changing landscape,” Pellegrino said.
“It’s not about one platform or another – we need to work together across platforms to achieve a method of measuring audience across screens, including on mobile which is not currently reflected in all industry measurements. We know more than half of Youtube watchtime now happens on mobile, which I’ll talk more about at Brandcast later this week.”
The Brandcast event on Thursday is Google’s showcase for Youtube, in effect its upfront presentation pitch to media agencies and advertisers.
Last week the Communications Council brought UK academic and marketing consultant Peter Field out to Australia to speak to the industry as part of the Effie Awards.
Field said the plague of “short-termism” being seen with the use of digital marketing channels could in part be blamed on executives with an influence on marketing budgets who themselves had no background in marketing.
“It’s driven by lots of things, partly in misguided beliefs from people in general management, who perhaps don’t have a marketing background, that somehow you can achieve everything in a quarter or less that you could achieve in a longer term, so there is no reason to think long term,” Field told Mumbrella.
Procter & Gamble has been the highest profile advertiser to retreat from its bullishness on digital channels, while other marketers are also challenging some of the longer terms metrics being driven by platforms such as Facebook and Youtube.
Ritson has grabbed attention around the country calling on digital platforms to back their claims about the success of social, saying that most brands suffer from low engagement on social.
He warned that the number being claimed by many digital players meant that no-one would be able to trust the data being presented for the next five years.
Field told Mumbrella that the entrance of academics into the debate was forcing companies to scrutinise the facts in ways that businesses themselves often wouldn’t.
“What you find is that a lot of traditional thinking, a lot of traditional media, a lot of traditional brand building approaches still deliver hard commercial gain. I welcome academic work in this area,” Field said.
Unusually, Field gave a brief speech during last week’s Effie Awards, which were sponsored by Think TV.
Pellegrino is pushing to start a broader debate on the measurement across screens, managed by both digital players and traditional broadcasters, and said that the company was also working with the IAB on the issue.
Google is working with our third party partners, other industry players and the IAB to improve measurement across the industry,” he said.
Note to academics. The audiences are engaged digitally. They want to be digital not mass market anymore.
Mass market is noisy and non relevant.
Content creates brands value not reach.
User ID not verified.
Note to Micheal. The mass market is digital. Mass market is noisy, but very popular.
Brands don’t need value, they need customers. Mass market delivers customers.
User ID not verified.
Hoffman & Ritson were correct to question the state of on-line advertising which is woeful at present and downright annoying in many cases. Fairfax & MailOnline as examples use incredibly annoying adverts that hover on their front page- very off-putting and I think annoy readers. This seems to be happening all over the net especially with newspaper websites.
We all understand advertising is a vital part of publishing and support publishers efforts to finance and profit from ads. But in-your-face adverts work against their advertisers. Well placed ads are constructive. Elements like Fairfax’s annoying ‘opt-out’ videos which are usually some reporter saying the exact same that’s in the copy, but preceded by an advert put me off ever clicking on their video links and I know many others say likewise. Instead a fixed ad in place of their silly video would be noticed and absorbed.
Companies seem to ignore all the rules of advertising when it comes to the internet.
User ID not verified.
One significant reason why we have had virtually NO credible progress in Australia in cross platform measurement is because Nielsen, are contracted by both the IAB and OzTAM to provide so called currency measurement Surveys for both online and TV. They have a conflict of interest to keep the two measurement systems apart created by the industry bodies themselves. There is lots of talk but the most pressing and significant issue facing our industry goes unaddressed with no real light on the horizon.,
User ID not verified.
A professor denouncing the greatest shift in communication the world has seen……seems legit.
The problem isn’t the digital platforms, the problem is the agencies. With traditional media its a set and forget approach, digital is a full time management, test and research process.
Facebook isn’t to blame that Coles has a low number of followers as Ritson highlighted, thats the Coles agency understanding the audience and giving them content to engage them. Thats the equivalent of me being single, posting a boring personal in a newspaper with zero engagement and blaming the newspaper for being single!
User ID not verified.
Well you’re right to fear the scrutiny of academics. God forbid someone with no financial skin in the game beyond making salient provable points studies the cluster frack that is our current approach to media. Be afraid be very afraid.
The problem is not the agencies. It’s everyone. Clients, agencies, media and the platforms included. And especially the commentators. (I know, irony alert). They are all running scared and trying to bullshit their way out of the financial pain they are likely to face. Rather than solve a complex problem.
Audiences are choosing to avoid advertising in all its forms, but especially the digital, content and social marketing “tsunami of horseshit”. The promise of digital as an advertising channel is about half what it hyped itself. Social I’d argue closer to 25% of its ‘promise’.
Facebook’s latest campaign to sell its product is advocating reach and mass, not personalisation for effectiveness. I believe them. But if they are right, FB is just another place to interrupt a mass audience – it’s clearly not about followers, likes or targeting. It should be judged against the same metrics as other ads. Reach and frequency. Advertising recall and likeability. Effect on brand affinity. Effect on shopping behaviour. In that order. And in reverse order of importance.
The digital hype is being called for the BS it is. Even by its main proponents. The people talking about it seem to have no idea what brands and businesses actually want from their advertising, how to build brands or how and when to connect with target consumers. Content marketers seem to think they are so awesome at writing stuff we’ll clamber to read their wisdom. Ask Aaron Sorkin and JK Rowling how easy that is and back the ego off a notch or twenty. The traditional media guys are hiding in a cave somewhere hoping it will all blow over. It will. But there won’t be a TV ads industry left by the time they emerge.
We’d all do well to take one of Mark’s classes. Or read a book on marketing. It’s ok. An e-book is fine. The future is uncertain. And scary. What’s certain is that, as yet digital marketing isn’t the silver bullet. It’s not even taking the bronze. I’d argue its struggling to make the podium in the qualifiers.
User ID not verified.
We already have a cross media measure and it has been been available for years.
It’s called Roy Morgan Single Source.
Of course we’d welcome the industry to pick up the phone or drop us an email here at Roy Morgan.
User ID not verified.
Mass marketing is digitally lazy. Why treat digital like analog?
Interesting to see how many brands and agencies still treat digital campaigns like analog. Too much inefficiency, noise and irrelevance.
The right tools bring your audience to you. Corecast.
User ID not verified.
Despite what many commenters have said, the biggest thing holding back cross-media measurement (and I note most myopically consider this to mean video) is that despite reaching adulthood this year, the internet audience (not a site, but the internet) is still measured monthly. Conveniently that is a very large number.
Much hard work is being done here in Australia to progress towards daily/overnight measurement. So let’s focus on daily measurement for the next twelve months, so that we then have data that can stand-up as a component of cross-screen measurement.
User ID not verified.
Hi John .
I just wanted to say that Roy Morgan measures the internet population and the long tail monthly already in addition to being able to provide daily measures through Roy Morgan Audiences. It’s frustrating that the industry chooses to ignore that these tools are in existence and instead seem focused on reinventing the wheel at additional time and cost to everyone.
Tim
User ID not verified.
Why is daily/overnight measurement the holy grail? As a marketer, in the absence of other metrics, why would a daily/overnight metric be at the most important metric to help me plan campaigns?
Isn’t daily/overnight only a metric because it is the maximum level of granularity available in a broadcast environment?
As a marketer, I am concerned with how many times my ad was seen over the course of a campaign, who it was seen by, in what environment it was seen and then ultimately what was the impact of the ad was.
User ID not verified.
Hi Hmmm.
You are right to be concerned. The industry has exclusively endorsed, a media publisher funded measure which struggles to deliver what you and the wider market needs. And we have seen in recent press the numbers the currency being reported are contentious.
I hate to sound like a 404 not found but the industry is not at all being collaborative with alternative and emerging vendors and in this regard it is actually a closed shop.
The bottom line is there is no real, genuine wider vendor collaboration in the digital industry only tapdancing and window dressing to avoid acknowledging the elephant in the room.
When the industry folks who are so passionately advocating the collaboration pick up the phone and or drop us an invitation to collaborate I’ll let you know.
I’ll certainly be more of a believer if and when that ever happens.
Tim
User ID not verified.