Why I wouldn’t lead my video strategy with Facebook ads
When Facebook recently announced it would be working with advertisers to develop six second ads, Xero's Patrick MacFie couldn't help but wonder where the ever-shortening rabbit hole would lead. Here, he details why he no longer wants to be a part of the "mad dash to the bottom".
Don’t get me wrong, I dig Facebook, and there’s no mistaking that it’s an absolutely critical part of any content engagement strategy. However, when it comes to rolling out a video content play whose sole purpose isn’t just to illicit shits and giggles, I personally wouldn’t lead any of my video amplification efforts with Facebook for a number of reasons. Here’s the most important one thats put a bee in my bonnet today.
The mad dash to the bottom for engagement
Facebook’s COO Sheryl Sandberg said in the companies recent second quarter earnings call that they’re now working with some advertisers to develop ads as short as six seconds… six seconds WTF?
12 months ago it was 15 secs, now its six secs, based on this trend what’s the next recommendation going to be… three seconds? For me, a six second advert says one thing: what’s the minimum amount of time I can possibly slide this advert in front of a viewer for without pissing them off and still get paid?
I’m a creative and there’s nothing more I enjoy than a tight brief, or a significant creative challenge, but when you get to the point that your message is being eroded down to three words or less, of one syllable each, I think its time to pause and reflect on what the hell is actually going on here.
For me the truth of video content is best summed up in the immortal words of Walt Disney: “Quality will out”. From the moment you publish a piece of content, it immediately becomes embroiled in a Royal Rumble-esque battle for the viewer’s attention.
As Andrew Robertson of BBDO said recently in Ad Age’s Tagline podcast: “You used to compete with what else was in the break (commercial break) now you’re competing with everything that has ever been created”.
To cut to the chase, my point is this: stop making shit content to fill your always on campaign quota based on the latest strategic insight on content duration and engagement, and start making shit that your audience actually wants to watch. What!? I know – mind bending stuff right?
Here’s a secret I’ll share with you after producing video content for more than 20 years. There is no magic duration that drives better engagement than another.
The simple truth is this that a video should be as long or as short as it needs to be to carry an incredible story, nothing more nothing less. Start designing your content from a story-first perspective and the duration will follow, my bet is you won’t be producing too many six second videos in your near future, unless of course its your intent is to annoy the f*ck out of your audience by interrupting them with your six second ad placed in the middle of the video they really want to watch.
In August, together with the IAA, Mumbrella is hosting a breakfast and panel discussion ‘Artificial Intelligence Just Got Real’ which will reveal whether the AI transformation will leave a trail of destruction or open up a world of opportunity. For more information, or to purchase tickets, click here.
Whilst you can make good video in under 6 seconds ie Vine or the guys at 5secondfilms.com you’ve hit the nail on the head as to why FB would be pushing it – the minimum amount of time you can get in front of someone without pissing them off.
Hard to craft something meaningful or engaging when the starting proposition is ‘how do I least annoy someone’.
User ID not verified.
Eat more popcorn
User ID not verified.
Interesting to note that Apple’s recent content piece, The Rock x Siri – Dominate the Day, is 3min45sec long and has been viewed nearly 14 million times in 2 weeks.
Quality will out indeed!
Perhaps we should be focusing on producing engaging and entertaining content which drives genuine marketing outcomes but is crafted in such as way as to be desired by consumers.
6 second video content … what a joke! Only the most gullible and lazy marketers will buy into this.
User ID not verified.
i’d imagine this is now a reflection of how fragmented peoples lives have become, visual sound bites, yes i think facebook is the white pages of social media that is fast turning yellow, finding it hard to disseminate what facebook is about now a days.
User ID not verified.
Are we talking about “branded content” or ads? Because an “ad” can absolutely be 6 seconds: product, logo, price point, tag line. Done. It’s like out of home, but animated. Why’s that hard? Not everything we do deserves a trip to Cannes. We don’t measure 6 second ads on view time, we measure them on post event marketing outcomes. Like we should with most ads.
For “branded content”, would venture that YouTube is a better home for longer form. But we need shorter teasers to drive people there. I notice film companies run abbreviated trailers on FB, Snapchat, and Youtube (who also have 6 second ads) to drive people to much longer trailers somewhere else.
Client’s (and creatives) always seem genuinely hurt when the completion rates of their epic 60 sec TVC’s are south of 5% on Facebook (and they are always south of 5%), but maybe it’s because the first few seconds of these masterpieces (some of which, honestly, would be amazing for cinema) are usually scene setting shots of trees, or darkness or a hipster that ties back to nothing related to the brand or product.
It only takes two seconds for a Facebook user to scroll from the top of their mobile screen to the bottom. We can’t blame the audience when we bore them in this short window. We have to give them something here. They’re on Facebook, specifically, to look at content. I say make content designed for Facebook to drive better outcomes. TVCs go on TV.
User ID not verified.
@Jeff I think you nailed it. What is it about? Of course the simple answer is: time on site = ad revenue.
The nature of Facebook’s beast changed irreversibly some time ago, god knows how many updates back. It has transformed from being a relatively benign and neutral online noticeboard with a timeline of stuff from your friends and organisations you’d opted into following, into a creepy amalgamated AI algorithm that comes across to me at least like the most annoying desperate friend I could possibly ever want to meet whose base goal is seeking revenue.
My favourite ‘moment’ on Skynet, I mean Facebook, is when I push the back button on my phone to exit and it frantically tries to reload some other content that might appeal to me and make me stick around a little longer. At least I don’t think it will be around forever, like some poet once said…
‘In my beginning is my end. In succession
Houses rise and fall, crumble, are extended,
Are removed, destroyed, restored, or in their place
Is an open field, or a factory, or a by-pass.’
User ID not verified.
I remember a social media person presenting the “insight” that shorter videos are more likely to be completed. The recommendation was that we should create shorter videos to get more completed videos.
It didn’t seem to cross their mind that the reason shorter videos were more likely to be completed was because these were the ones most likely to get to the end before disinterested users inevitably scroll past.
Where does it end? Why not one second videos? The completion rates would be sublime. The world remains mad.
User ID not verified.
” facebook is the white pages of social media that is fast turning yellow” Gold.
User ID not verified.
@ Golden Crumpets
Yeah!
User ID not verified.
@Matt “Interesting to note that Apple’s recent content piece, The Rock x Siri – Dominate the Day, is 3min45sec long and has been viewed nearly 14 million times in 2 weeks.”
Do you know how much they’ve spent pushing it with media $? I don’t – but it’s probably a lot.
I could film a piece of poo – and it will get 14 million views if I put some media $ behind it.
$$ buys reach.
User ID not verified.
@ D Brent … I am sure the marketing budget behind this content piece was significant – be pretty stupid on Apple’s part to pay whatever they paid The Rock to make this and then not make the most of it by spending some marketing $$ don’t you think?
If you genuinely believe that media spend will drive 14 million views of you “poo video” then I think you may need some lessons in social / viral / content generation / marketing in general.
Dollars may by reach but quality content buys engagement and talkability and this is what the Apple piece has delivered.
Do you know what percentage of people elected to view the movie from start to finish who were NOT pushed there by media? I don’t – but it’s probably a lot.
User ID not verified.
I go to YouTube to watch video’s. I go to Facebook to see what my ‘friends’ are ranting about…
User ID not verified.
Perfectly said!!
User ID not verified.