Fairfax considered dropping Sydney Morning Herald masthead for SMH
As Fairfax Media negotiates with media buyers over ad rates for its new tabloid, or compact, weekday format Mumbrella has learnt the company considered dropping its historic Sydney Morning Herald masthead.
Media buyers and sources inside the company have confirmed that mock-ups were prepared replacing the newspaper’s traditional Sydney Morning Herald masthead with the “SMH” brand.
And a leaked email to staff at Fairfax’s Sydney radio station Radio 2UE reveals the company is keen to “push” SMH as a parent brand across the print, online and tablet formats.
A spokesperson for Fairfax today declined to comment on the mock-ups that had been prepared.
Major media buyers say the SMH mock-up was one of more than ten produced and shown to a variety of media agencies.
Mumbrella understands the company drew up mock-ups with the shorter “SMH” brand at the top of the newspaper’s front page, due to concerns the 181-year-old newspaper’s existing masthead appeared “squeezed” under the tabloid format.
The smh.com.au online brand has tended to follow a more populist approach aimed at driving traffic than its print sibling the Sydney Morning Herald.
“I have seen all the mock-ups and they tested a number of different things and definitely tried to abbreviate and that sort of thing,” said one media buyer who declined to be named.
“From what I understand they found it was going to lower both the quality of the perceived brand and the quality of the editorial. That’s obviously not what they want to do.”
Some Fairfax reporters have also shown some of the mock-ups of the new format.
One senior reporter told Mumbrella: “They tried it but it had to be squeezed in on the tabloid format and didn’t look any good.”
“All kinds of grandiose plans come out of our digital division but the degree to which they get enacted is minimal”, said another reporter.
“No serious option, and I’ve seen a few, has anything but the traditional masthead… it’s just in a smaller format.”
The SMH move appears to be part of a wider branding exercise with a leaked email, obtained by Mumbrella, from Fairfax Media’s Sydney radio station Radio 2UE revealing on-air presenters and staff in the newsroom have been instructed to “push” the phrase “SMH”.
In an email last week to staff Acting Content Director Clinton Maynard said the request had come directly from management at the Sydney Morning Herald and was part of a broader realignment between Fairfax’s print, online and radio assets.
“At the request of our friends at the Sydney Morning Herald they’re encouraging us to change the way we reference the paper and the website,” Maynard wrote in the email.
“(Fairfax) are pushing the title ‘smh’ to cover the paper, website and tablet app across their marketing.”
“So the plan should be on-air when referencing a Herald story refer to it as the ‘Sydney Morning Herald’ but further references should be ‘smh’.”
The email also emphasises staff should not use the popular name “The Herald” to describe the newspaper, this is despite reporters at the newspaper themselves using “The Herald” to refer to the paper in print.
“We want to avoid the use of the ‘The Herald’.”
“News should switch to ‘SMH’ reports.”, wrote Maynard.
Mumbrella also understands media buyers are continuing to push the company for a reduction in its print advertising rates due to decreased space of the advertisements under the new format.
Fairfax is continuing to argue for the full page rate for a tabloid advertisement to remain the same, even presenting media buyers with research suggesting that the effectiveness of message will increase.
“Our rates aren’t changing but our shapes are,” said a Fairfax spokesperson. “We are moving to a visual impact ratecard,” he said.
John Sintras, CEO of Starcom, would not comment on the “SMH” mock-up but said negotiations over the ad rates were continuing.
“The reality is advertisers are going to want value and it is difficult when you are sold a format based on column centimetres and suddenly you change the rules,” said Sintras.
“Their argument is that the impact is going to be the same or greater than under the old format and therefore they are asking the same rate.”
Readers will see new the tabloid design of the newspaper on March 4 when it launches its tabloid format for its weekday editions.
The Sydney Morning Herald’s Saturday papers, for the moment, appear likely to remain in broadsheet size.
Nic Christensen
SMH. Tut-tut. Sorry, I couldn’t resist…
User ID not verified.
Whatever they do to the masthead, if they don’t do a sport/business lift out there will be trouble. How else will I and my partner share the newspaper around the breakfast table?
User ID not verified.
Too bad Fairfax were slow off the mark in 1994 and missed out on registering smh.com – so much for the savvyness of Conrad Black and Kerry Packer.
User ID not verified.
One of the best decisions they’ve made. The old masthead is clunky and old-fashioned. It might be historic, but this is the second decade of the 21st century.
It is interesting to note that more than 30 years ago Fairfax decided to drop the name and masthead for The Newcastle Morning Herald. The name was changed to The Newcastle Herald – because that’s what everybody called it – and the Old English masthead (similar to the SMH) was replaced by a sleek and modern print font. When the paper changed to a tabloid the masthead was further modified. The word Herald was (and still is) in large letters with Newcastle in smaller letters above it.
Fairfax shouldn’t botch the relaunch of the tabloid SMH. The paper needs a complete new look and an overhaul, and bringing in a new masthead would assist the modernisation process and make it more appealing to younger generations.
User ID not verified.
SMHuh?!!? Tampering with mastheads of respected publications needs cost/benefit thinking for each context. Internally, verbally and online, SMH may be okay, but from a reader perspective, how much brand equity would be lost when expressed in print? Would the New York Times or the Washington Post be as eager to compromise their heritage-based quality and integrity by switching to conveniently cool acronyms?
User ID not verified.
Idiots.
User ID not verified.
But where will I do my crossword? I still buy the Sydney Morning Herald but I avoid SMH like the plague! Quite frankly, if I want celebrity gossip, I’ll go to Daily Mail.
User ID not verified.
When the adults step in at Fairfax? For some time now they’ve been telling everyone that the print thing is passe and it’s all digital today. Now they’ve trying to tell people that the smaller print page is just as valuable as the old, tired big one. And then they think they might just casually kill off a famous brand for er, what? Some thing that fits in a form factor? Hello?
@Hoin, you might like to check this. But I suspect that the typeface on the sleek, modern Newcastle Herald masthead is not a whole lot newer and younger than the one it replaced.
User ID not verified.
Change it at their peril!
User ID not verified.
So let me get this straight…they are looking at a complete redesign of the paper and they shouldn’t even consider a brand change/update? Do any of you people actually have any business experience at all? I would guess they won’t change the masthead but the idea that they shouldn’t take a look at it is just silly.
User ID not verified.
Why not superscript “Sydney Morning”, leave “Herald” the same size, set it in a box and float the masthead about the front page, positioning it according to convenience and what works best with the day’s art element?
That would also leave the current masthead space as a top-dollar skybox available to advertisers.
You don’t need to be Nostradamus to know Fairfax will make a huge mess of the tabloid transition.
An honest, unadorned Helvetica? Naah, none of that — it will be some wanky font, probably serif, or a visual abomination like the one they use in the Sun-Herald, and hasn’t that paper been doing just beaut lately!
The problem with Fairfax isn’t the masthead, it’s the culture.
SMH indeed! Stroppers Make Hash
User ID not verified.
The old English masthead represents a long history of integrity in reporting. Its the guardian of what is written within the paper. Protect it at all cost.
User ID not verified.
Janet: The Silly chucked reportorial integrity (and good subbing) long ago. The latest example:
http://www.quadrant.org.au/blo.....-to-ignore
When you think about it, deep-sixing the gothic masthead is entirely appropriate. What connection does today’s paper have to the tradition of integrity represented by the current masthead?
User ID not verified.
reff is obviously not a very deep thinker or appreciates Australian history – what is reff doing on Australia Day? Not very bright, if reff doesn’t understand the symbolism and value of a newspaper masthead!
User ID not verified.
Janet, on Australia Day I’ll probably go idiot-spotting. You’ve got me off to a good and early start. For God’s sake, read comments properly before mouthing off.
User ID not verified.