NRL approaches Google to bid for rights as code tipped to split games across TV networks
Tuesday June 16 4.05pm: Updated story, with comment from Google. Please note the correction at the bottom of story.
The NRL has approached online behemoth Google about lodging a potentially multi-billion dollar bid for the broadcast rights for the code.*
Media buyers have confirmed they are aware of talks between the parties which, due to anti-siphoning laws, would have to see the rights sold to Google, for use on its video platform Youtube, but then on-sold with individual NRL matches split across the TV networks in order to comply with legislation, requiring games to be shown on free-to-air.
One senior media buyer with knowledge of the confidential talks told Mumbrella: “Google buying the rights, or even discussing buying the rights is interesting, because it declares their long term intention of distribution of live games through over the top (OTT) content.”
A spokesman for Google this afternoon confirmed recent talksm but declined to be drawn on the detail, saying: “From time to time we do talk to organisations about what they might do in the online world.”
The NRL also issued a statement yesterday declaring: “The NRL is talking to a range of parties about broadcast rights but we will not be commenting further while the process is under way.”
The NRL is rumoured to be seeking around a $1.5bn price tag for the rights, which if the online giant was successful would give them the ability to stream live games on its online video streaming platform Youtube. Telstra currently has the digital rights for the code.
Google has increasingly shown a willingness to bid for sporting rights. In 2013 it made a deal for the online broadcast of All Blacks games internationally and it has also previously signed deals to broadcast online the Twenty20 Indian Premier League competition.
All media buyers contacted declined to comment, on the record, due to their commercial relationships with Google and the TV networks but another senior media buyer with knowledge of the talks said: “It would be huge if Google entered the fray and given the financial position of some of the TV networks on-selling/splitting the rights could work in their favour.”
Many buyers also noted that having the NRL on Youtube would help the online giant in its bid to be seen as a premium broadcast platform, and charge a higher advertising rate on its online videos.
Multiple sources have sought to play down the likelihood of the online giant entering the fray this time around, but have also expressed concern about the potential for it to be used by the code as a “stalking horse” to force the networks to up their price or encourage the networks to launch a joint bid with the likes of Seven and Ten.
Media buyers have noted the potential for a network under a split rights scenario, to get “footy nirvana” of AFL in the Southern states and NRL in the Northern states. The AFL would also be watching the potential to split rights with interest.
“Given their declining audiences overall I think there would be a number of TV execs who would do the maths on what could be footy nirvana for the networks,” said one agency boss.
In recent weeks attention has been on the financial state of all the TV networks. Yesterday pay-TV operator Foxtel bought 15 per cent of the cash strapped Ten Network, with the deal coming only a week after a major collapse in the Nine share price following an earnings downgrade.
In the wake of events at Nine, Seven felt the need to issue a statement reassuring the market about its earnings.
“Under the anti-siphoning laws Google can’t keep all the rights but how it would work is that they would have to split the rights across the free-to-air networks,” said a buyer, who noted that News Corp Australia has previously held the rights but then on-sold them to the FTA TV networks.
Another media buyer noted: “This raises questions about whether the TV networks can or can’t afford these kinds of enormous sports franchises in the future and have to divide them up between them.
“I think the other key thing to this is that with increased shareholder pressure on return on investment for all the TV networks the question is what does this mean for them financially – does their financial structures force them into broader, cheaper, less diverse programming.”
Nic Christensen
*Correction a previous version of this story stated the AFL was the sporting code involved. This was incorrect it is now understood that it was the NRL that approached Google.
This is rubbish. Anti-siphoning rules have zero application to google and don’t ‘require’ anything to be shown on free to air. The rules only give free to airs first go as opposed to pay TV.
User ID not verified.
No mention of Telstra, who currently have live streaming rights for both AFL and NRL? Can’t see this happening, at least not in the next rights cycle. The AFL just want as many bids on the table to drive the price up.
User ID not verified.
This is total rubbish. Rookie error by Mumbrella
User ID not verified.
However it is possible that the TV networks with the AFL rights share / simulcast with Google.
User ID not verified.
It’s not total rubbish, but the likelihood of Google being a primary bidder against the TV guys is very small. They may consider paying for some of the left overs but I doubt it. Their name gets thrown in every time a major sport’s rights come up…
User ID not verified.
I’m just fantasising a bit here, but imagine…
Targeted spread that was finally something more than a pre-roll getting in the way of the video you want to watch.
Suddenly we could target TV in a granular way. The 23 year old university student would see the “banking package for your first job” ad from ANZ instead of the retirees insurance ad. AND the broadcaster could tell us who REALLY watched the content rather than inferring from a small sample.
From there we could track how effective a particular ad buy was and whether the creative was successful. We could even A/B test the client’s preferred Call To Action.
The Free To Air Broadcasters must be shitting themselves.
User ID not verified.
Got someone upset, Nic.
Of course AFL should be courting the people with money and growing revenue streams.
Local FTA/PayTV can’t hope to match the dollars on offer from successful digital businesses like Google, doubly so when they’re collapsing.
The global audience reach and all that sweet merchandising potential doesn’t hurt either.
User ID not verified.
What? No special comments from Steve Allen?
User ID not verified.
I would love to imagine a utopia where all codes sell their rights to Youtube, and Youtube becomes a one stop shop for live sports in Australia. I’d even pay a small subscription fee + get smashed with ads for it.
User ID not verified.
The fact that this is even been discussed shows how fast things are moving. The idea that people need a Channel 7 or Foxtel to watch AFL is one only they are pushing.
User ID not verified.
Holdbacks kill the ad value of any deal for digital. AFL has locked up sponsors in most categories so commercial value relies on getting Toyota et al to leverage their sponsorships through ad spend more on youtube and less on FTA – it is a zero sum game. Foxtel amped up the value because it can drive subscription revenue. the only way AFL gets what they want is if Foxtel (or YouTube, Telstra whoever) can drive significant paid subscriber growth or they unbundle their holdbacks/sponsorships.
User ID not verified.
Show me where Google has invested those sorts of dollars in something that isn’t a platform in the past … it’s never put its hand in its pocket for upfront rents.
User ID not verified.
Wow, Mumbrella. Pretty sure your mistake is too big to just republish the article having swapped out AFL for NRL and posted a bit of a disclaimer…
User ID not verified.
Hi Sub-editor,
We’re aware it’s a significant error and we have moved to immediately correct the record. However, Google has now confirmed the substance of the story which is they were approached to make a bid for a major sporting code a move which could see the TV rights split across the TV networks.
Cheers
Nic – Mumbrella
that’s a helluva correction.
User ID not verified.
Where’s a good old ‘Paddy Bombing’ when you need one? Come on Mr Douneen!
User ID not verified.
NRL – that’s a very different kind of story Mumbrella.
User ID not verified.
Either way, it’s only good news with computers and laptops at home and office, because people will be able to see matches on YouTube. Under the current rights deal with Telstra, NRL and AFL matches can be streamed live on tablets and smartphones, but not computers.
User ID not verified.
@Toothpaste..
When you’ve built an empire like me, then you can talk.
Thats the thing about empires…the bigger you build them the faster your competitors want to tear them down.
Let them have their fun, Stezza and I will deal with them later.
Toothpaste will you be our hero? Will you save the NRL from Google?
User ID not verified.
Hopefully, most people can stream those matches above 240p & without much buffering.
User ID not verified.