-
Opinion | Features
-
You'll struggle with the culture shift, Mat: The DNA of media buying is completely different to earned media
In this guest post, Anthony Freedman argues that media agencies will find it harder than they think to shift into public relations territory because it requires an entirely different culture.
Like a lot of people, I noticed the coverage surrounding Mat Baxter’s reveal of UM’s new “Creative Connections Agency” positioning last week.
It started with a piece in Mumbrella provocatively headlined “Media agencies aren’t our competitors” and continued the following day after Mat was goaded into stating UM “won’t be entering media agency awards any more”.
For anyone who didn’t read the stories, the gist of it is this; UM is no longer a media agency, it’s a ‘connections company’ that is embracing earned and owned media, and thus will herein compete with the likes of R/GA, Google and (closest to my heart) One Green Bean. -
Is content marketing myopic?
Amid the ongoing hype around content marketing Mark Yeow argues agencies and clients are getting too bogged down in the detail and need to look at content more broadly.
Our industry’s fixation on content marketing is keeping us from seeing the bigger picture.
The power of content extends far beyond lead generation, conversion, and other measures of marketing ROI. It is, perhaps the critical ingredient of any brand – essential to the vision of any discipline involved in creativity or communication, and indicative of their healthiness and longevity. -
Why SVOD is the catalyst for a TV evolution
Streaming services have been getting a lot of headlines of late. OMD's Jeremy Gavin looks at what impact such services will have on evolving the television as a medium.
The Netflix beast is a product of its environment. -
Curiosity killed the cat, not the creative
A curious mind is a prerequisite for being a creative. So why don't more youngsters entering the creative world ask questions asks Will Clark.
As a junior creative one of the most powerful creative tools is already at your disposal. Curiosity can be a crucial tool when starting work in an industry you know very little about. After my first few years in advertising I have come to realise the full potential of being a curious creative.
Fresh out of design college and AWARD school, I was ready to get stuck into the world of real briefs, real clients and real award potential. However I quickly discovered that the world of advertising is vastly different to the picture that we often paint in our minds before getting there. -
Will greyhound racing ever get back on track?
Following the expose of blooding and other practices in greyhound racing last week Damian Madden looks at what the sport needs to do to regain public trust.
As an animal lover, and somebody who has been to the dog track occasionally, I was abhorred when I saw the Four Corner’s footage earlier this week of greyhound trainers ‘blooding’ their dogs using live animals.
Watching the fallout in the days that followed I began to wonder if greyhound racing could recover from this catastrophic blow. Has its brand been damaged beyond repair? -
How David Thodey helped restore Telstra's brand
Today David Thodey announced he is retiring as CEO of Telstra after five years in the role. Richard Curtis who worked with the telco during his time with Interbrand, explains Thodey's role in rebuilding one of Australia's biggest brands.
Two experiences bookend recollections of my time working with Telstra, over a seven-year period in which I worked with three different marketing teams.
“Didn’t we do the brand last year?” was how one Telstra executive put it, somewhat taken aback by the idea that the Telstra brand might evolve, let alone have implications for his own business unit’s activities. -
The data is in and Birdman will win the Best Picture Oscar
After predicting the winner of the Best Picture Oscar two years in a row using data Bryan Melmed puts his reputation on the line for a third time.
Our audience data and insights accurately predicted the best picture Oscar winner in 2013 and 2014. So it is possibly foolhardy to put our neck on the line again but as the saying goes, go hard or go home so I’m here to tell you that Birdman will win. Or at least this is what the data suggests. And here is why.
-
Doing work just to win awards? That’s worth nothing
D&AD CEO Tim Lindsay argues scam is a disease and doing work to just win awards is worth nothing.
You would expect us to say this, but it has been an exciting year at D&AD. With the help of the Glue Society, Google and others we’ve brought New Blood to Australian shores for the first time, launched our new NowCreate programme and forged new partnerships with creative organisations around the world – such as AWARD - to enable us to better support the global creative community. It has been a good year.
However, as much as we’d like to focus on all the positives about our wonderful business, it’s important we don’t stick our head in the sand and ignore the more difficult stuff.
-
Baxter buries the Big Boutique as UM reboots business model
UM is shifting its focus from being the Big Boutique to the Creative Connections Agency. CEO Mat Baxter and chief strategy officer Sophie Price sat down with Nic Christensen to explain why the new positioning is more than just semantic, how it has torn up its remuneration model and why the traditional media agency focus on paid media is broken.
Say what you want about Mat Baxter, the iconoclastic CEO of UM knows how to generate a headline. -
Six tips for a watertight contract to help when ambassadors go off brand
Navigating celebrity ambassador agreements can be difficult, with several high profile agreements ending badly in recent years. Here Stephen von Muenster and his team give some tips on what to look out for when drafting the legal terms. Personalities who become brand ambassadors can be a powerful marketing tool for brands. From celebrities to social media influencers, they have the potential to make brands and products relatable and accessible, increasing exposure and successfully driving sales. Unfortunately for brands, their fairytale relationship with an ambassador doesn’t always end happily ever after. -
Seeking out the pink dollar
Brands are increasingly cashing in on the popularity of the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras in an attempt to lure the pink dollar with the likes of ANZ's GAYTMs leading the charge, writes Robert Burton-Bradley.
Sydney’s Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras is attracting an ever increasing pool of funding from a growing number of premium ad and sponsorship partners, including social economy booking firm Airbnb, as well as a return of last year’s high profile ANZ Bank GAYTMs campaign.
Ben Mulcahy from specialist agency Pink Media, which targets the LGBTI community, said advertising and sponsorship growth around Mardi Gras had been growing strongly each year.
“It gets bigger every year and from the sponsor perspective there’s huge value to be derived,” he told Mumbrella.
-
Across print and digital, newspaper customers are turning away
Today’s newspaper and digital subscriber numbers are the worst yet, says Mumbrella’s Tim Burrowes.
Soon I’m going to stop writing about this each time the quarterly numbers come out. It’s too depressing.
-
Want real audience engagement? Move on from snackable content
Listicles, quizzes and cat videos might be the flavour of the moment for content marketing, but it's only through in-depth long form content brands can really engage customers argues Atomic 212's Richard Quinn.
In today’s time-starved world, people just don’t have time to read longer content items. Give them short, quick snippets which can be quickly digested, like snacks on the run.
Or so you think.
In truth there is substantial evidence pointing to the contrary, which could have significant implications for your content marketing strategy. -
Why politicians can't sell
Recently Prime Minister Tony Abbott was criticised for not being a good enough salesman for his policies. Here Elliot Epstein looks at how politicians could improve their sales technique to their electorate.
Law, Unions, Engineering, Journalism, Small Business, Academia and Agriculture have all delivered people to politics.
But the world of high stakes senior sales professionals, steeped in the art and science of winning complex, competitive multi-million dollar deals has not regularly supplied our parliaments with its exquisitely skilled members. -
Calling bullshit on customer loyalty
In this opinion piece Dan Monheit argues people don't buy a brand out of a sense of loyalty, but out of habit.
The current divorce rate in Australia is the lowest its been since 1976 when ‘no fault’ splits were introduced, and still stands at a staggering 40 per cent.
If almost half of the adult population cannot commit to a life partner, next to whom they’ve publicly declared ‘til death do us part’, how much weight can we really assign to studies that track customer loyalty to brands of cars, electricity, canned beans and deodorant?
-
Plain and simple
The best pieces of marketing make a case so well, it feels like there can be no further argument.
Like this piece for Cancer Research UK making the case for plain packaging for cigarettes.
Case closed.
(Hat-tip: TP)
Tim Burrowes
Comments
28 May 12
10:11 am
As you say ‘Case Closed’
Can’t wait for the tobacco companies to lose their case against the government.
28 May 12
10:25 am
wonderful
28 May 12
10:26 am
Take a bow clever ad company working for Cancer Research UK. I don’t think I’ve seen something as effective since the Grim Reaper.
28 May 12
10:29 am
This is bullsh!t, I don’t smoke, I don’t like people smoking, but give a bunch of middle-upperclass kids some packages and they will say that!! It’s the lower class who has trouble with smoking. Their parents smoke and it’s so normal to them. Changing the outside isnt what’s going to change whats inside… Ever heard of the saying lipstick on a pig??? It’s just a big fat waste of time and money. There are fundamental flaws with our society regarding cigarets. And making the pack they come in a simple colour will not fix those problems.
28 May 12
11:02 am
Just compelling.
28 May 12
12:07 pm
It’s clever. Perhaps it appeals to us as middle-upper class individuals, but smoking isn’t simply limited to the ‘lower class’. It’s prolific and if this change in packaging, and supporting ad campaign, can make a difference by reducing some of that dependancy, then it’s a good thing.
28 May 12
1:48 pm
Brilliant
28 May 12
1:51 pm
For this ad to work, you need to first be displaying the cigarettes to kids, which is already unlawful in the only Plain Pack jurisditcion.
Additionally, is no one going to point out that Cancer UK gave cigarettes to kids in order to make an ad?
As Nick Naylor says, the anti-smoking lobby want cancer boy to die.
28 May 12
3:24 pm
Adam Ferrier tweeted this some time ago.
It would have been interesting to do the same exercise with pharmacist-only medicine packaging and the colourful pills. In fact you could put anything in front of them.
When asked to say something about anything, people will say something. Even kids. In fact, especially kids. This is a known flaw of focus groups.
Plain packaging is simply fucking about, avoiding prohibiting it.
But then prohibition doesn’t work terribly well, either.
Price the stuff to the wazoo and tell people it’ll kill you is about as good as it’ll get.
Informed choice means that some will still make a poor choice.
That’s the price for personal liberty I’m afraid – some will accept the risk of killing themselves in the pursuit of their happiness.
28 May 12
4:26 pm
Here in Australia the tobacco companies launched a multi-million dollar advertising campaign to fight plain packaging.
Proof positive that it’s a VERY effective tactic.
28 May 12
4:57 pm
After seeing this, how would you sleep at night arguing against plain packaging? Bloody good job AMV BBDO.
28 May 12
9:10 pm
You guys have not obviously read the many complaints about this advert and the activities of a once respected research charity – in the UK. … showing cigarette packets to kids. Really?
Had you shown kids packets of condoms they would have said same thing – would the hysterical cry be “condom manufacturers target kids” – of course not.. Classist claptrap.
29 May 12
3:01 pm
Condoms do not kill people @Sara B. The more colourful the better if it got peeps to use condoms rather than not…
29 May 12
3:29 pm
To the naysayers,
As you’re reading this article, I’m assuming you either work directly for a marketing company or work for a company that services them. So, with your rationale that the packaging has no effect, could you please explain why you either spend or charge (depending on you aforementioned role) large amounts of money designing it?
Thank you, and good night.
29 May 12
11:10 pm
Ronnie,
As you said something so ridiculous about packaging, I assume you don’t work in marketing or brand design.
If your assertions had merit, then illicit drugs would have no appeal, as they have no packaging whatsoever.
Yet they do. One for you to ponder tonight.
Sleep tight.
30 May 12
2:57 pm
Adgrunt,
I noticed that you failed to address the question I posed.
However, if you want to compare the marketing strategies of illicit drugs with legally marketed products, so be it. Once again, I’ll use your rationale.
I can’t exactly recall ever seeing an ad selling the virtues of heroin, or a bus-side telling you where you can get a good deal on some. Therefore, using your own logic, advertising in these mediums must be an entire waste of time. Hmmm.
30 May 12
5:59 pm
Ronnie,
I didn’t answer your question as the fallacy you propose is what is comprehended in Marketing – broadly in lesson 1 or 2. That’s what marked you out as having little grasp of the overall concepts of marketing, influence, etc.
You’re also not very good at parsing “rationales” or logic – I was suggesting that perhaps advertising isn’t some amazing mesmer machine. That there is some rational and emotional thought and filtering process occurring in the viewer. Otherwise every anti-smoking ad that has run for 30 years would have stopped smoking in its tracks.
Do you mindlessly go out and buy nappies because you’ve seen an ad for them?
So, some homework for you.
Read this lot http://tiny.cc/lm23ew (it’s a link to Mumbrella) – it should cover most questions.
Do come back and ask any questions it doesn’t answer. Which should be very few.
Don’t let the bed bugs bite.
31 May 12
3:42 pm
Yeah, I started smoking at age ten because I loved my father’s Viscount pack design. It was all red and gold with a seductive burred silver paper liner that you pulled out to see the fags.
No, I fucking didn’t. And what’s more, in those days I actually bought his cigarettes for him. He’d give me fifty cents to go around the shop and get him a packet of Viscount and a box of matches while he listened to the races on 3UZ in his workshop. Why? Because it wasn’t illegal for one, and for two he didn’t jump to the stupid conclusion that just because I’d seen/handled a box of cigarettes I’d immediately want to start smoking the things.
The premise of the commercial is completely wrong. Children take up smoking because their peers do it, or their parents disapprove, or they are just contrary little bastards. Plain packaging won’t stop any of that and neither will anti-smoking lobby commercials with cute imagery and no logic.
31 May 12
6:36 pm
BTW – This http://bit.ly/myquitbuddy seems a more worthwhile effort than plain packaging.
1 Jun 12
4:34 pm
What a result! Produced, directed and heavily edited (not suggesting scripted) footage endorsing that packaging and branding works! Hope every packaging and branding agency includes this video in their value proposition.
One question before I go… Why do so many take illicit drugs? Do they also come with a royal crest?
4 Jun 12
9:45 am
I don’t think anyone is suggesting that packaging design is the sole influence in any purchase decision, but whether you like to acknowledge it or not, it is one of the influencers.
4 Jun 12
12:09 pm
Ronnie,
You didn’t read that thread, did you.
In order for it to influence you, you’d need an established need or desire in the first place. Brand is about a choice.
Do you really believe people start smoking because they see a pretty packet?
The evidence from Canada cited by even the Cancer Council suggested that price and education are the strongest influences. Or just ban it.
Dont’ be lulled by the belief that doing anything, is doing something. Sometimes it’s just rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic.
12 Jun 12
3:29 pm
Any of this ‘evidence’ to ban fancy packaging for filthy tobacco is worthwhile.
The twits who oppose attempts to get rid of tobacco are just that — twits.
Surely they must be aware of the dishonest and devious tactics of big toboacco?? or are they just showing how they too have been conned?