Ten hits out at media reform proposals, ‘It is now obvious to everyone that SCA plans to merge with Nine’
Ten’s newly appointed boss Hamish McLennan has issued an angry statement in response to the government’s media reform proposals.
He has called plans to scrap the 75% audience reach rule “staggering” and said it would enable Nine Entertainment Co’s widely rumoured merger plans with the TV assets of Southern Cross Austereo, formerly known as Southern Cross Media, to go ahead.
McLennan said that it was now “obvious to everyone” that Southern Cross Austereo plans to merge its TV assets with Nine and suggested that “whispers have taken place over the back fence” between media minister Stephen Conroy and the potentially merging parties.
The merger can only go ahead if a rule that prevents networks broadcasting to more than 75 per cent of the population is scrapped, which would happen under the media reform proposals.
SCA and Nine are widely rumoured to have been in merger talks, although SCA – a publicly listed company – has not disclosed its intention to merge with Nine.
McLennan said in a statement:
“The Government’s determination to rush through the removal of the 75% audience reach rule is staggering.
“All Australians have the right to know what whispers have taken place over the back fence, and what conversations have been had with the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Senator Stephen Conroy.
“On March 4 this year, a statement issued by Southern Cross Media said it was ‘reviewing a number of strategic options’ and ‘the board has not, at this stage, formed a view as to any preferred option’.
“It is now obvious to everyone that Southern Cross Media’s intention is to merge with Nine Entertainment Co.”
“But Southern Cross Media remains silent. Its shareholders have a right to know if the company’s directors are meeting their continuous disclosure obligations. Its shareholders have a right to know how detailed and advanced the discussions between Nine and Southern Cross Media are, and what has been discussed with the Government.”
Online trading is the next big thing says Rob Atkinson in a piece that first appeared in
Is the best way of being successful in Australia not be here at all? In a feature that first appeared in
From journos to ad execs and PRs, these days everyone seems to have a book in them. But what does it take to get published and will you actually make any money? In a feature that first appeared in
In an article that first appeared in
From dressing the part to playing the gatekeeper, Leo Burnett Sydney’s Susie Henry tells us how to make it as the face of adland in a piece that first appeared in 
Government funding bodies are lazy and decadent, says industry veteran Michael Thornhill but in a piece that first appeared in
Life is sweet for freelance writer Max Kitchen, but in a feature that first appeared in
First there was the Grand Prix. Next came the reported $500m bid for cricket rights, then Ten secured the 2014 winter Olympics. So, can sport save the ailing network? In a feature that first appeared in 

Cosmo’s Kate Leaver tells us how to bluff it in her job in a feature that first appeared in
Hi Chris,
Brett Clegg, group director – business media, Fairfax Media, in a Q&A that first appeared in 

Comments
14 Mar 13
1:10 pm
I am curious if these comments are being forwarded from the bunker of News Limited in NY from the in-coming CEO ?
14 Mar 13
2:17 pm
What will Bruce Gordon do with WIN? Surely they wouldn’t be foolish enough to sell Ten…
14 Mar 13
2:26 pm
Wait, lets ask the media to tell us if new media “Regulations” are a good idea.
The lets ask if …
Tony Abbott want to see a lowering of the budgie smuggler tax
or
How Julia Gillard feels about stopping news polls.
14 Mar 13
2:37 pm
Yes lets see if we can make Bogans even more stupid
14 Mar 13
2:56 pm
Given the history of Ten in getting things wrong maybe the government has got these reforms right.
14 Mar 13
5:06 pm
It’s hilarious watching News Ltd, TEN, Seven and Fairfax complain about the reach rule.
They were all in agreeance when they thought they could stitch up a good deal. Now they’ve seen but a taste of what could come and they’ve gotten cold feet.
In a SXL / Nine merge the day would (potentially) look like this:
Breakfast: Won by b/fast radio – Austereo;*
Morning: Won by combined Austereo / Nine
Afternoon: Won by combined Austereo / Nine
Drive: Won by Drive radio – Austereo
Evening: 2nd with Nine programming (Seven winning most nights).*
* We all know that despite the hype Sunrise and Today don’t have nearly have the audience that breakfast radio does. Same goes for night time, once people are home and switch on the TV noone cares what Hot 30 countdown is on the FM dial.
Now assume that the Austereo programs heavily promote Nine during the day and no longer give Seven tentpoles any love then you can see Seven shows being hustled out of the public conciousness… naturally people will watch whatever others are talking about and the breakfast radio talkback (i.e. having guests from Block vs MKR) is a great way to get this to happen.
That leaves DMG with the dregs of the 18-39 demo to pair up with either Seven or TEN. Both would want to make sure they have a stranglehold on this. To have any hope of competing against a Nine/SXL merge.
So the very vocal complaints that are coming from the media companies are not because they are concerned about the freedom of the press – it’s because the last 5 years they’ve been doing deals trying to position themselves as the dominant force in Aus media and these reforms are going to pull the rug out from under them.
14 Mar 13
5:43 pm
Media should be formed and operated as a tool to serve the people. To inform, educate, alert, entertain etc
It should not be used to create assert power and agenda.
News Ltd wants to assert power and lets face it they have many agenda, the main one is greed. Should they and the other ‘mob’s be regulated / or reined in a little – bloody oath they should.
14 Mar 13
5:43 pm
smart phone pigeon English re comment 7…