After Sorrell’s departure, adland truly is no country for old men
Martin Sorrell’s departure reflects the end of an era for WPP - and the advertising industry as a whole - says Vamp’s Ben McGrath.
Advertising lost one of the original members of the old guard this weekend as Sir Martin Sorrell resigned from WPP. The 73-year-old was the company’s founder and Britain’s highest paid executive.
Regardless of the recent allegations of misconduct, Sorrell built WPP into an empire. He turned a two man business into an advertising powerhouse employing 200,000 staff in 112 countries and after 33 years, he was the longest-serving CEO on the FTSE 100 blue chip index.
Some will say ‘they don’t make them like that anymore’ and it’s true.
For Sorrell’s business model, the model that undoubtedly made WPP the leading name and him a very rich man, was showing signs of tiring. In the past year shares fell by almost one-third.
Slashed budgets from big clients like Procter & Gamble were blamed for WPP’s poorly performing ad agencies, but as experts speculate over the company’s future, it’s becoming all too clear that the traditional advertising landscape has changed dramatically.
WPP’s success was in a different time. A time of aggressive buying, big campaigns and expensive adverts. Now, ad blockers have propelled native advertising to the fore. Smart phones have made mobile-first advertising essential and the explosion of social media has created selling phenomenons out of influencers.
Sorrell famously labelled tech giants like Facebook and Google ‘frenemies’ of the advertising world, suspicious of their influence in the sector. Last year he recognised, ‘Amazon is becoming a force in advertising’, but even with these observations, the question remains as to whether a huge conglomerate like WPP can adapt to the agility demanded by modern advertising.
For an agency to effectively serve the needs of brands in this new world, they must stay a step ahead of the rapidly changing technology and consumer behaviours. They must collaborate, not fear, these tech companies.
Consumers are more empowered, demanding and overwhelmed by choice than ever before. We know that trust in media and big brands is on the decline and people no longer wish to be advertised to. Those ignoring the ‘skip ad’ cue on Netflix and Youtube are a rare breed. Now, big marketing messages are translated into the voice of influencers, giving consumers the sense that they have invited the interaction into their lives, rather than being confronted by it.
The shift to digital advertising presents more frequent, smaller scale opportunities that suit tighter brand budgets. It also leaves agencies less dependant on loyal, long term client partnerships for steady revenue. Rather than a big budget TV ad, months in the making, brands are opting for reactive and highly-targeted content marketing.
As the recently retired global chief digital officer of GroupM, Rob Norman noted: “It’s pretty clear that in the last five to seven years, the playing field has been tilting in one direction — not just for WPP, but media owners and advertisers in many ways.”
While it’s not yet known who will fill the big shoes of the WPP leader, this new world will undoubtably create a new generation of agency leader. Digital natives who grew up online so have no need to learn the disciplines of social media. These will be the leaders that revolutionise and modernise the traditional agency model, or decide it’s no longer fit for purpose.
Ben McGrath is the co-founder of influencer marketing platform Vamp.
I wonder if you know what Sir Martin actually did for a living?
User ID not verified.
I have never read such a crock of shit in my life.
User ID not verified.
…we should abandon traditional methods and only look towards social and influencer marketing.
Get with the times you dinosaurs!
User ID not verified.
You’re right Ben – let’s shift more advertising budget into the non-audited and un-regulated influencer industry
User ID not verified.
There are no ads on Netflix to skip.
User ID not verified.
You must not read much.
User ID not verified.
A typically poorly researched, factually flawed, and naively written piece of ‘Pro-Digital’ schlock.
User ID not verified.
‘a new generation of agency leader. Digital natives who grew up online’
#bestclicheever
User ID not verified.
I see ageism is flourishing in the Australian comms sector!
User ID not verified.
How about we all chip into to crowdsource him with a bigger crock in which to dump the next load of swill?
User ID not verified.
I’m one of those dinosaurs who didn’t grow up online.
Because there wasn’t an online when we were young. But we could envision it.
So you know what, we had to invent and then create it. So it’s such a shame that we apparently have no idea of how to use, commercialise, and keep safe what we invented. In my life I’ve always found that invention and creation are greater skills than simple usage.
User ID not verified.
This opinion piece is perhaps the strongest case for why advertising absolutely needs “old men” and women more than ever. TV, OOH , print, these media in fact deliver greater reach and effectiveness than any amount of social media and native content. Can you seriously be that ill informed about the basic principles of advertising and brand effectiveness.
User ID not verified.
So nicely said Paul! I will remember this in my next talk on diversity – thanks for making the point.
User ID not verified.
C://Program Files/ My Documents/Crap Folder
User ID not verified.
I do. And it’s still drivel.
User ID not verified.
Gezza, you can reach 15 million Aussies on social. Maybe 70% of that if you buy on all 3 TV networks. Dumb comment.
All channels work, they’re just different and obviously have different roles.
And yes, ads as a whole are becoming less effective. But influencer marketing is not a fucking solution either.
User ID not verified.
Mumbrella really need to look at what they allow to be published to this site.
It’s scary that this level of thinking comes from someone who evidently has quite a senior position in market.
User ID not verified.
“Those ignoring the ‘skip ad’ cue on Netflix…”
This guy really knows his stuff.
Thank the Lord for Digital Natives.
User ID not verified.
@Paul R
Did you just take credit for inventing the internet?
User ID not verified.
‘skip ad’ cue on Netflix
User ID not verified.
MRDA.
(Sorry if you don’t understand – it’s a pre-digital reference).
User ID not verified.
Since when did the consumption habits of ‘digital natives’ act as the norm for all of Australia?
With over a third of Australians living in country areas, some whose phone connection drops in and out of service and their patchy internet connection reduces their ability to be reached by ‘thumb stopping content’, who and what do you imagine their influences and trusted sources are?
User ID not verified.
Agree.
We absolutely need people with experience to explain why this narrow thinking is the end of us. Not the answer.
Remember when Direct Mail was the end of advertising? LOL.
User ID not verified.
@Anonymous, don’t know why you don’t put your name to that comment, it’s a great point.
I just don’t get why we need generalisations for every single thing in marketing. The truth has nuance. We’ve turned into a profession of Donald Drumpfs.
User ID not verified.
This is a joke right? Influencer marketing, what a crock of shit, nobody’s who think they’re famous (ummm you’re not famous, you just think they are) have fuck all influence over anyone.
User ID not verified.
Since when does Netflix run ads? This is … amateur at best.
User ID not verified.