Australian FMCGs don’t suck at marketing on social – just measuring it
Creativity counts when it comes to social media, everyone knows that. But true social results come when we discard previous models of success like mass reach and focus on what really matters - the target market, argue Dan Monheit.
“Australian FMCG brands suck at social media and it’s basically a waste of their time”.
That was the general conclusion drawn at the end of a discussion I found myself in with a dozen respected agency guys earlier this week.
They’re wrong.
Australian FMCG marketers and senior agency guys suck at determining what success looks like. They’re caught between a past where an ad ‘felt’ successful because lots of people saw it and a future that ain’t quite what it used to be.
In the ’80s and ’90s, ads were part of the shared, collective experience created on a nightly basis by the perfect storm of three TV channels, no internet and no smartphones.
We watched Friends, Ally McBeal and 90210 by the millions, ads and all.
It’s not surprising then, that the ads – for margarine, superannuation, hi-fi systems and tampons – felt successful, too.
They’d been seen by millions of us, regardless of whether we were in the target market or not. Yes, famous ads were great, but let’s not kid ourselves; we also wasted a tonne of money making them famous with people who couldn’t care less.
And while we all know those days are over, we haven’t got the future we were promised, either.
Social was introduced to us as a stunning, revolutionary, two way channel and we ran at it head-first with our cheque-books out.
We thought we were signing up for owned and earned media. We thought we were signing up for free, unrestricted, direct lines into our end consumers.
We thought we were signing up for engagement and brand fans and virtuous circles of adoration between tuna companies and main grocery buyers throughout the land.
But we weren’t. Facebook pulled off the greatest bait-and-switch in history. And here we are, on the other side of it, wondering how to know if any of us are even doing a decent job, when our decoy metrics like ‘likes’, ‘comments’ and ‘community engagement’ are not even worth the paper the post-campaign reports are printed on.
Marketers, agencies, let’s get two things straight.
-
FMCG brands by their very nature have always been built with reach and frequency. If you’re an FMCG marketer you must, fundamentally, believe in reach and frequency as key objectives.
You must fundamentally believe that getting your message in front of the right people is better than not getting your message in front of the right people. That talking to prospective customers often, is better than not talking to prospective customers at all.
-
There are more than 14 million active users of Facebook in Australia. Five million on Instagram and a rapidly growing two million on Snapchat.
Chances are, your ‘right people’ are out there, and the segmenting tools built within these very platforms can help you find them.
In 2016, social channels like Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat are our best tools for building efficient reach and frequency. Imagining they’ll do anything else is a fallacy. Evaluating them by any other criteria is misguided, regardless of what you used to do or how you thought things were going to pan out.
Under Armour founder and CEO, Kevin Plank, put it beautifully: “If you find yourself in a situation where the terrain differs from the map, I suggest you go with the terrain”.
The terrain tells us that formats make a difference. Video and live streams are being given priority in news feeds above all else.
The terrain tells us that targeting matters. Using the tools within the platforms including audience segmentation and retargeting dramatically reduces our cost per interaction. Dramatically, as in 80-90%.
The terrain tells us that creativity counts, but not how it used to. Today, creativity is about stopping the thumb, not delivering a wonderful ‘ah-huh’ moment after 28 seconds. Punchlines go at the start. Nobody’s hanging around if they don’t.
Australian FMCG brands who go with the terrain and use social to pursue efficient reach and frequency are doing fine.
In fact, many are doing great.
Unfortunately for agency guys, competitors and general snoops, it can be hard to tell who’s kicking arse – especially when all you can see from the outside looking in is how many people liked a brand’s last post – a metric that’s been irrelevant for years.
Dan Monheit is the director of strategy at Hardhat Digital
“In 2016, social channels like Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat are our best tools for building efficient reach and frequency.”
No. They’re not.
User ID not verified.
Big on bluster, low on facts.
User ID not verified.
Please. Go watch Mark Ritson. I cannot be bothered to repeat things he says more eloquently than I can. Then by all means come back, with some actual facts and data and let’s have a chat about how to build FMCG brands. And the role social can play in a zero based budget. It’s nice to see a social media guy talk about reach and frequency. Sadly you don’t seem to deliver any of either in your “social is still awesome” tinged suggestions. But I am open to hearing more. Once you have some data. You know. That thing that digital is so good at.
User ID not verified.
What’s the benefit of highly granular capabilities on social when every competitor brand can access the same data? The problem is not how we measure on social or the format we utilise. Collaborating with Social mediums to identify the right Tech & combine it with our client’s 1st party data is the key to deliver customised experiences to FMCG potential customers.
User ID not verified.
Hi Bob, what’re your recommendations?
User ID not verified.
I’m with Bob on this one – whilst the sheer scale of Facebook, Instagram & Snapchat cannot be argued with, not all media contact points (be that a spot, impression etc) are created equal, and as such, reach without impact is pointless. We’re falling into that classic trap of linking correlation (scale) with causation (= it must be better)
User ID not verified.
Newspapers
Television
Outdoor
User ID not verified.