Publishers’ Google Accelerated Media Pages traffic going unrecorded by Nielsen
Audience measurement firm Nielsen has conceded that it is not measuring digital audiences of sites using Google’s AMP service despite having told publishers that it is able to do so.
Google’s Accelerated Media Pages allows publishers to deliver faster mobile page loading by hosting an AMP version of their pages with Google.
However, a number of publishers have told Mumbrella they are becoming increasingly concerned that audiences reading their content in this way are not been recorded.
This is despite Nielsen’s Australian digital content ratings handbook specifically telling publishers that it does cover AMP, along with Facebook Instant Articles which works on a similar principle. The company tells publishers its software development kit (SDK) has the capability.
While Facebook Instant Articles and Facebook video can be measured with publisher opt-in, Mumbrella understands a number of publishers have been informed their audiences are still not being measured, whilst others were informed that they were.
In the handbook published in July last year, Nielsen said: “The Nielsen SDK can measure ‘off platform’ audiences, and attribute those audiences back to the publisher within reporting. This does require a custom implementation of the SDK. Currently, content appearing in Facebook Instant Articles and Google AMP is measurable. Other major platforms (e.g. Apple News) may be available in future.”
Publishers using Google AMP locally include Fairfax Media, Bauer Media, Conversant Media, Daily Mail Australia and The Guardian.
In the US, Nielsen is already able to measure this capability.
When asked by Mumbrella whether it was measuring AMP pages in its Australian Digital Content Ratings, Nielsen conceded that it was not, with a carefully worded statement saying: “The measurement capability exists and has existed since the launch of DCR. However, we are finalising beta testing before we roll out broadly to market.”
Mumbrella understands those publishers who have been informed about the ongoing process keep experiencing delays.
“Off-platform content consumed via Apple News, Snapchat and Instagram is currently unable to be measured,” said Nielsen. “Current off-platform measurement requires the Nielsen SDK to be integrated by the publisher and covers Google Search in-app browsing, Facebook Instant Articles, Facebook Video and any other publisher video or non-video content shared via Facebook and consumed on the Facebook platform. ”
But Nielsen justified including the service in its DCR handbook, as – although it is not actually provided locally, the measurement capability “exists”.
“As with any new feature or functionality, we conduct thorough beta testing which at times leads to divergence between a capability being developed and when it is released to the market as a whole and reflected in market data,” a Nielsen spokesperson said.
“Publishers are aware that the capability is in testing and will be rolled out shortly. We regularly update our client service team and the IAB (Interactive Advertising Bureau) on the status of testing and when we expect to roll out to market.”
Of the publishers mentioned above what % of their pages actually utilise AMP? Surely you could’ve asked that of those who you spoke with? That’ll give you an insight into how critical it is or isn’t for Nielsen to have this measurement available right now.
User ID not verified.
Nielsen Measurment should be taken with smallest grain of salt possible. The difference of tagging capabilities across all major publishers is so drastic that you are never really comparing apples with apples, even worse when you get into the video space.
And really if an agency is buying a smartly – they will buy based on a real audience (logged in/registered) freq capped by user cross platforms to manage delivery and reach. UA measurment will soon become the next UB.
User ID not verified.
Yeahbut, I run a mid-sized news website. AMP accounts for about 11% of traffic now. It’s significant.
User ID not verified.
About as accurate as a horoscope.
User ID not verified.
… not that Nielsen UA relies on tags.
And if an agency buys smartly it will be comparing metrics across multiple publishers – something that no single publisher can do. And it will be using independent data sources.
As for logged in/registered that simply does not equate to usage. Ever seen the ‘Keep Me Logged In’ check box?
And just because your server shows someone as being logged in does NOT mean that they are utilising/seeing your content. Currently I am logged into MANY things. But at this second Mumbrella has my focus while all these other applications and publishers are still merrily racking up time on their server oblivious as to whether their content is actually being consumed.
User ID not verified.
ummmmm
100% of pages are AMP enabled by any half-decent publisher.
for breaking news and/or live events, amp pages do substantial traffic
User ID not verified.
yeah.. nup.
Of course Nielsen relies on tags, the recently launched Digital Content Ratings is entirely tag dependent (the media panel method is totally bollocks).
And good analytics tags know if a tab is ‘in focus’ and active with mouse or touch actions.
User ID not verified.