Marketers need to stay marketers, not technologists
In this guest column, Ant Gowthorp urges marketers to keep their focus – despite the tech demands placed on them.
In the battle between humans and technology, there have been some casualties. We’ve seen privacy eroded, solitude eliminated and information set free amidst a rising tide of progress.
While proving a force for good in our lives, technology has also elevated our expectations around effectiveness and productivity. By making everything much quicker and easier, it’s made us feel like we have to ‘do it all’.
Marketers in particular have been left with a collective empty feeling, our professional confidence dented by a pace of change seemingly too rapid to match.
In recent years, as technology grew more sophisticated, marketing professionals with 20 years’ experience became convinced they had to moonlight as technologists to stay relevant.
As someone who specialises in creativity and technology, I can confidently say this simply isn’t true. In fact, the flexibility technology delivers means the opposite is true.
Now more than ever, marketers need to stay marketers.
The trouble with technology is that it’s nothing like basket weaving. There’s no end-point at which you can say ‘I know how to weave baskets now. I’m a pro.’ We’re in an unprecedented era of technological progress.
New materials and advancing computer science are extending our technological capability into the realm of true science fiction, and even professional technologists are having a hard time keeping up.
Machine learning, AI, robotics, VR, mobile wallets – these systems are going to change the world sooner rather than later, combining to form a spider’s web of channels, touchpoints and data sets.
In the confusion, you can’t blame marketers for feeling like technology is more master than slave.
But rather than trying to understand and harness everything at the tech buffet, this increasing complexity calls for a division of labour between marketing and technology disciplines.
Marketers need to understand that their skills sets around brand and customer are more important than their ability to wireframe an app. That is someone else’s job.
Smart marketers start with the problem that needs solving and work with trusted partners to collaboratively come up with the most elegant solution.
If technology has an effective role to play in the strategy, so be it. Technology is fed by the creativity, insight and intuition of marketers.
It can be used to solve problems, but it has no mind to solve them itself. Above all, technology should bend to the solution, not the other way around.
The great thing about technological progress is that it’s brought increased diversity and vibrancy to how brands connect with people. As channels proliferate, media agnostic marketers have myriad more avenues for reaching people with effective, tailored communication.
Creativity and customer insight are still central to achieving marketing success, and hardware alone cannot replace that. Technology is the tool by which the idea is executed – it’s not the idea itself – that still comes from the mind of the marketer who understands their customer and their brand.
Ant Gowthorp is a managing director at Imagination
Not sure this is correct. Here’s why. The premise is wrong. Just like copywriters were first only writing print magazines, then had to write for all mediums, so marketers just had to understand one technology, now they need to understand many.
It’s just a changing skillset. And the key is understanding the theory of technology first, so you can apply it quickly.
Given most kids and marketing grads will be grounded in some firmer understanding of tech theory via code knowledge, I’m expecting this to become more common. And marketers who can’t quickly understand tech at a high, conceptual level will quickly be left behind.
After all, you’re pretty useless strategically if you can’t think about how to use all the tools in your arsenal. Any strategy a marketer worth their salt writes without an understanding of the tech that can/could power it is just contributing sheets of paper to a dusty pile.
User ID not verified.
Have to disagree on some points. As a creative, it is incumbent upon me to understand the technology I’m relying upon or delivering through. This doesn’t mean I must be a slave to the machine, however if I’m going to ask the technology to bend to my will, I need to understand what it is I’m trying to bend and where its flexible points are. For this I would rely on a ‘technologist’ because I’m not very techy myself – but the efficacy of my response to brief would drop if this technologist was silo-ed from me. A division of labour is the last thing I would be hoping for, in fact the right technologist might actually be able to make a contribution outside of their core competency as they grow accustomed to my side of the business.
I do believe in the supremacy of the human touch – creativity and insight – but I’m not fooling myself that machines will not be able to do a lot of backroom stuff better, if not now then soon. I don’t believe that google has just automated ‘creativity’;
http://www.theguardian.com/art.....-dream-art
but it does get me thinking, so to speak.
User ID not verified.
If marketers focus on driving tangible business results everything else, including ‘technology’, sorts itself out.
User ID not verified.
Sorry. Really have to disagree with this. Communicators built the printing press, the “wireless”, the billboards, the Tv and the Internet. Marketers always have to understand the technology their customers are living in. You can not be a student of society and NOT pursue an understanding of technology. We live in a digital world. This feels like it was written by a marketer who has given up.
I say learn how to solve problems for the world your customers are living in.
User ID not verified.
When planning strategy, the challenge is to know enough of whats available & on the horizon without going too deep on the details. You need to be a jack of all trades, not a specialist. This is not new thinking, rather that there are just many more tools available to us now (including tech) and the skill is knowing when to use them and when to park them.
User ID not verified.
Totally agree, what we see happening is that ‘marketers’ are chasing shiny lights and tactics. I worked in marketing advisory for business owners, and also help businesses audit the practice of their marketing departments. I’ve seen a terrific decline in the skill of strategy – understanding customer, market, competitor and self – because of the confusion caused by technology. Many marketers these days get so wrapped up in the minutia of tactics and channels – they’ve forgotten how to actually think strategically.
I totally disagree with comments from some above that a marketer must understand the technology. Not if they want to stay being a strategic marketer they don’t. Do you think Richard Branson needs to know how the engine works on his planes to run an airline, or that Kerry Packer or Rupert Murdoch need to know how to strip down a newspaper printing machine to run a news organisation – no they categorically do not. And if the marketer of today does think they need to know how the engine works then they’ve lost the battle of the big picture – and big picture and strategy is the only place a strategic marketer should be operating in. Follow the process, get the strategy right, and then engage experts in each chosen marketing tactic to make sure your strategy is successful. Well done, great insight. Hunter Leonard – Founder and CEO of Blue Frog Marketing, Author of Marketing has no off switch.
User ID not verified.
Well said Ant! Whilst there is a stack of tools and tech available, there seems to be a shift where some may simply distract marketers. The industry has so many bright shiny new things. In the right instance some may well be valuable in capturing the consumers attention or do consumers see them seen as simply invasive and creepy? Whilst the adtech industry salivates and marvels at its rapid progress, how far removed and disconnected is it from consumers everyday behavior and actual interaction with technology? Perhaps this is why the industry now feels an unending need to disrupt consumers and celebrate its ability to do so. Are consumers seeing adtech efforts as pestering? Perhaps its time for marketers to get back to understanding the consumer and brands and creating great campaigns that consumers enjoy rather than dismiss.
User ID not verified.
Dudes, it is incumbent on us to ask questions, understand and exploit technology. The critical aspect is that the tail doesnt wag the dog aka the bright yound nerds who think usability = customer insights should never be driving the bus. We drive, we ask to understand the ‘tecnichal’ priorities like fuel, water and what can go wrong. We keep the journey heading in the right direction, they help us figure out smarter ways of getting there.
User ID not verified.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXBqzpExvrk
User ID not verified.