PRs are ‘the smartest person in the room’ at cross-agency briefings argues n2n boss
The PR industry has not lost the social media race, claims Jamie Verco, the head of social at n2n Communications and Fuel Communications, arguing the PR person “is the smartest person in the room” when it comes to collaborating with other agencies to solve a client’s problem.
Speaking at the Creating the Future of PR event, presented by Ross Dawson’s Advanced Human Technologies Group, Verco argued PR is the best placed discipline to tackle social media.
“The race is definitely not lost. PR is extremely strong in social, we are one of the strongest agencies in social,” he said.
“We’re the smartest people in the room. In the last decade the average ATAR [Australian Tertiary Admission Rank] score for a person that we employ would be north of 95.
“When we’re sitting in a cross-agency room we’ve got some pretty smart people that can contribute to the conversation.
“The other thing is we have good rates. We have the intelligence, the creativity and we bring strong solutions to those problems.”
Edelman’s Michelle Hutton told Mumbrella in August the industry “lost the social media race”.
Verco was also confident the PR industry is “well placed to engage around” native advertising.
“It is primarily around content that works for the publisher and works for the audience and we need to move much quicker into developing this kind of work for our clients,” he said.
However, Telstra’s general manager of retail and media communications Matt Trewin is not confident the PR industry has the necessary skillset.
“The ability to create compelling branded content that would be interesting to consume and share hasn’t typically been a skill the average communications person has had,” he said.
“We have found more people have to either learn to be able to do that or increasingly from a corporate perspective we are employing a different type of communications person to be able to create that content for us.”
Trewin said Telstra looks to people with a background in TV or journalism to employ to create branded content for their own platforms.
Miranda Ward
Mumbrella is presenting the Festival of Branded Content and Branded Entertainment on November 5. For more information on the program and how to book tickets click on the banner below.
“We’re the smartest people in the room. In the last decade the average ATAR [Australian Tertiary Admission Rank] score for a person that we employ would be north of 95.”
So no one else in the industry could hire people with ATARs 95 plus? And anyone with an ATAR under 95 isn’t as smart then?
Well known fact that many successful business people weren’t so good at school. Using an ATAR as an argument for PRs leading client briefs… that’s even a stretch for PR.
User ID not verified.
Hahahahaha
User ID not verified.
“In the last decade the average ATAR [Australian Tertiary Admission Rank] score for a person that we employ would be north of 95.”
this can’t be true, surely
show me some data
User ID not verified.
Yes, because the smartest people are always the ones with an ATAR score of 95+. What is this backwards crap?
User ID not verified.
I think in this instance and based on this ‘article’ ATAR stands for Australian Total Arrogance Rank. In which case north of 95 seems about right.
User ID not verified.
A really smart person would have kept this to themselves
User ID not verified.
Yeah. Cos super geniuses naturally gravitate towards public relations. Missed the cut for law did you champ?
User ID not verified.
Not smart enough to recognise that insulting everyone else in the room will get you nowhere, should have stuck the comment up your ATAR
User ID not verified.
Meanwhile on the graph with wanders on the x axis and tosses on the y axis this bloke is invisible because he has disappeared up his own arse.
User ID not verified.
Oh turn it up mate.
User ID not verified.
“shots fired”
User ID not verified.
I have met many a Doctor and Lawyer that are clueless when it comes to basic everyday issues…
User ID not verified.
i would never hire someone with an atar under 95, whatever industry it may be
User ID not verified.
Sure you are, darlings 🙂
User ID not verified.
Typical self infatuated PR claptrap. Talking themselves up and others down.
User ID not verified.
ATAR of 70..
http://courses.curtin.edu.au/c.....-relations
User ID not verified.
ATAR= 70
http://courses.curtin.edu.au/c.....-relations
User ID not verified.
Full disclosure
UNSW and UTS are 85
USYD is 95.5
Curtin 70
etc
User ID not verified.
I recently graduated from one of the best universities in Sydney with a distinction average mark and achieved an ATAR over 90 in my HSC, and I think both are much more an indicator of work ethic then they are intelligence
User ID not verified.
If you have to tell someone you are, you probably are not. But nice bait for comments…
User ID not verified.
Maybe you are the smartest person in the room, however I am reminded of 2 things my father used to say to me – who, for the record, was sickeningly smart.
1. If you have to say it, you’re probably not it.
2. Being smart does not mean you are automatically good at everything.
But let’s sign off with a quote from the great Lucille Ball – someone that the author of this piece could well do learning from.
“If a man guesses my age, he may be smart but he’s not very clever.”
User ID not verified.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
User ID not verified.
“We only employ people who did their homework at 17” yeah good on you mayte
User ID not verified.
What a flog! Mate, if you have to say it, you’re definitely not it…
User ID not verified.
“In the last decade the average ATAR [Australian Tertiary Admission Rank] score for a person that we employ would be north of 95” says the bloke who hasn’t backed up his argument with any evidence whatsoever.
User ID not verified.
If ever I’m the smartest person in the room, I’m in the wrong place.
User ID not verified.
LOL
User ID not verified.
I’m glad this guy isn’t advising clients on messaging strategy… Oh, hold on.
User ID not verified.
PR haha. You must be kidding. If I wanted gas in a meeting room I can provide my own.
User ID not verified.
Cringe worthy remark rating of 99.99%.
User ID not verified.
The smartest guys in the room.
User ID not verified.
Any chance of finding out which subjects the high-achievers studied? If they are all “soft” subjects, it’s not that impressive. The low number of students doing the hard yards in NSW – physics, applied mathematics, advanced economics etc – is seriously concerning. That’s why the ATAR ratings are being re-assessed so that schools with a higher number of students attempting more difficult subjects will achieve higher rankings over the next few years.
User ID not verified.
If I was his client I’d be questioning if I’m dealing with the right communications partner.
User ID not verified.
That’s ironic.
User ID not verified.
1. Why are your employees disclosing their ATAR? Are you hiring straight out of high school? I work in marketing in a reputable company and all my colleagues have bachelors or higher.
2. I have nothing against PR, I think it’s great. But if you’re such a good PR person why does this article have such a negative reception? You obviously don’t have a very good understanding of your audience and this is an example of poorly crafted messaging.
What agency did you say you came from again? I’ll make sure we go elsewhere.
User ID not verified.
“If you’re the smartest one in the room, you’re in the wrong room.” -Richard Tirendi
Also, you would think.. being a PR company… they would understand that saying this could be bad PR for them.
User ID not verified.
This is a PR disaster
User ID not verified.
I don’t usually comment on these things, but after graduating from a state school with a ‘not-so-intelligent’ 67.9, and enjoying a fruitful PR career for half-a-decade, I couldn’t have been happier to get out of the PR industry and migrate into digital marketing and advertising, effectively doubling my salary in the process.
I’m sorry to say, but public relations agencies – as a general rule – have no clue about digital. They are completely backwards, and are most certainly out of their depth when it comes to all things social. Sure, they might spin a nice pitch on Microsoft Powerpoint 2008 to get the business, but when it comes down to implementation, they’ll likely just pass anything with the word digital in it on to the new Account Coordinator. Did I mention she’s probably working sixty hour weeks for $34,000?
Meanwhile, the rest of the agency focuses on pumping out dull media releases that nobody, particularly in 2015, will ever want to read. The future of brand management is content marketing and visual storytelling, and to get there the industry needs to switch on to the demands and intricacies of short-form content. PR’s – like always – are last to the party, and nobody really wanted to invite them anyway.
If you want an agency that can set up highly-targeted, conversion-pixel led social media campaigns that really drive home some meaningful outcomes, go and see your local digital marketing guru, because safe to say, the PR guys and girls just don’t get it.
User ID not verified.
@Ben Having just had a short stint at a PR agency recently, I can’t agree more. I couldn’t believe how stuck in the past PR is.
User ID not verified.
High IQ (arguably) but super-low EG (proven0
User ID not verified.
My experience (long & substantial is that PR types are mere dumbasses compared to Training Managers. Have you ever been to a meeting with more than one Training Manager in attendance. There’s just no point in any mere mortals attending at all.
User ID not verified.
This is so embarrassing – this guy should have gone down with Enron. Smart PR people, are smart, don’t need to say so and may well have flunked school, while dumb ones are dumb.
The real art is to come away from the cross-agency meeting with custodianship of the big idea, then being smart enough to realise you need to work with experts in their fields to deliver it…
User ID not verified.
I used to work there. I got an ATAR of 72. They must have hired some actual geniuses to get that average up after I left. I really like Jamie, he is an incredibly smart guy with amazing business nous.
I’m now trying to get into the digital marketing field, something that is far more relevant these days and more likely to control social in the future – so I disagree with him in this case.
User ID not verified.
is this a what not to say? or a test to measure article comments and engagement… if so well played… otherwise, I’d consider this a PR disaster
User ID not verified.
I think this article says more about the commenters than the writer. I’m amazed by the aggression shown against someone who was trying to pump up his industry and his own company in a presentation.
The ATAR comment in this article is one hell of a dubious one that’s received its deserved backlash.
I wasn’t exactly proud of my ATAR score but I never wanted it to be a permanent stamp on my forehead that would forever limit my career prospects. Subsequently, I worked hard for my bachelor’s degree, two master’s degrees and notched up six years of experience in the publishing industry. And after all that, I’d feel pretty damn insulted if I was interviewed by an employer who was more interested in how I performed when I was 17 or 18 over all my other accomplishments in the following decade of my life.
Ironically, this demonstrates profound intellectual laziness to measure employees by a an inconsequential numerical score from your teen years over your experience and the words of the references of your previous employment.
User ID not verified.
I’m assuming the meeting is in a toilet cubicle…
User ID not verified.
Wow
Sad thing is the majority of people I’ve met in PR have a very similar attitude.
Good luck working off the back of other departments though.
User ID not verified.
I dropped out.
User ID not verified.
The PR person “is the smartest person in the room” when it comes to collaborating with other agencies to solve a client’s problem.
If that problem can be solved by spinning lots of hot air with no tangible result, then maybe.
PR agency giving PR positive PR? Job done. The result? Even more cycnicism.
User ID not verified.
i got an ATAR of 97, studied, Commerce/Law, worked in law and banking, and can run intellectual rings around 99% of advertising industry people i meet – although they are far more accomplished hucksters than I. On the other hand, the business journalists i have to deal with are way smarter than agency people….
User ID not verified.
When I studied Graphic Design, you needed a UAI of 97.8 – the same level as Vet Science, higher than Engineering and almost as high as Medicine.
Since I realised designers get paid sh!! and are often at the lower end of the spectrum in the communications industry, I’ve had varying roles and founded varying companies across all disciplines.
I can say one thing however. PR people may have a higher UAI / ATAR / RETARD score than everyone else in the room, but they definitely are not the innovator, in fact they scarcely come up with an original thought.
I see PR people like media people who just can’t quite hit the same numbers.
Good luck tho 🙂
User ID not verified.
What’s that James Watson quote about the secret to chasing success?
“If you’re the smartest person in the room you’re in the wrong room.”
User ID not verified.
As a journo who deals with PR folk from all over the country every day and marvels at their general ineptitude and how badly they generally serve their clients, it terrifies me to think of a room in which the PR person was the smartest.
User ID not verified.