‘Some things shouldn’t be for sale’: Agencies stand against Sydney Opera House ads
Is the Opera House Australia's biggest untapped billboard, or is it an iconic landmark which should remain unattainable for brands? Senior industry executives have their say on whether or not brands should be able to advertise on one of the world's most famous landmarks.
After the New South Wales Government announced it would be running ads for the upcoming Everest horse race on the sails of the Sydney Opera House, Australia is divided over whether or not brands should have access to the iconic landmark.
The news has sent Australia into meltdown with contrasting opinions on whether the world-renowned landmark should be left alone.
Mumbrella reached out to senior agency executives to get their take on the debate, and the message was loud and clear: “Some things shouldn’t be for sale”.
Adam Washington, senior consultant at Orchard, says:
“The Opera House is a global landmark, up there with The Eiffel Tower or the Taj Mahal, so the content it promotes should be subject to stricter scrutiny than your average billboard. That’s appropriate, because Australia’s endorsement is implied.
“To me, content that celebrates national culture or art passes the test (e.g. The Olympics or the art of Vivid Festival), but advertising doesn’t. The Everest is commercially-geared event with close ties to gambling, so in this case I disagree with Alan [Jones] and Scott [Morrison], it shouldn’t be on the sails.
“It’s a slippery slope. Even an ad man wouldn’t want to see price points and CTAs on the House down the track.”
Laura McRae, senior planner at The Royals, says:
“In light of recent news, it seems like you could argue both sides. From a purely economic standpoint, advertising on ‘the biggest billboard in Sydney’ would seem like a brilliant idea – a sure way to get high awareness for whatever you’re advertising. But the Sydney Opera House isn’t a billboard. It’s a work of art, a piece of Australian culture that holds World Heritage status.
“If the Sydney Opera House can be deemed ‘just a building’ and in a moment’s notice become an advertising billboard, then where does it stop? Does this mean we can advertise on Uluru tomorrow? It’s just a rock, right? Not everything in our communities can become advertising space; some things hold cultural significance and need to remain sacred.
“Art, in my point of view, is a form of communication which represents whatever the artist, or in this case the architect, intends it to mean. Since its inception, the Sydney Opera House has been created to generate feelings, thoughts and observations in its admirers, making it an iconic ‘piece of art’. Therefore from a personal and moral standpoint, I cannot support the use of The Sydney Opera House as advertising space. Additionally from my understanding, The Sydney Opera House management have a policy of never displaying branding and logos because in doing so, it risks losing its World Heritage Status.
“Unfortunately, the NSW government’s recent decision to override this policy has given us insight into what some politicians value more: pure economic gain versus the protection of Australian arts and culture.”
Nathan Birch, CEO at Interbrand, says:
“The Sydney Opera House is an international icon and UNESCO heritage site with a brand value, as an asset, running into the millions of dollars. Projecting a horse race on the sails would be simply imbecilic. The argument that a barrier draw is equivalent to the Wallabies, Vivid or the Olympics is misinformed at best. This move is contrary to everything the Sydney Opera House has worked on in the past several years.”
“As a cultural icon, the recent push to turn it into a glorified billboard is not the kind of brand Interbrand envisioned when we led their rebrand in 2016. On a personal level, I think it’s tawdry idea. But from a strategy perspective, it’s absurd.
“As Alan Jones so forcefully said, ‘we own the Opera House’. The public’s reaction has been heartening. The esteem people have in the brand and the connection they feel with the Opera House has been made clear over the last few days. The sails of the House belong to Sydney, and Sydneysiders have said ‘no’.
“The recent drama shows a very naïve view of the value a brand plays in the economy of our state. Cheapening what it stands for just to promote a horse race will only hurt not just the Opera House but the international image of Australia in the long run.”
Nickie Scriven, CEO at Zenith Australia, says:
“The Sydney Opera House is the most iconic Australia building and I don’t think it should be seen or used as Australia’s biggest billboard.
“The Opera House is an arts, culture and entertainment precinct so I really don’t think there is an acceptable argument to allow the promotion of events that don’t occur in this precinct. There are more than enough ‘out of home’ sites and billboards available. Let’s leave our Australian icons alone and allow our community and visitors to enjoy them in the form for which they were developed.”
Simon Brock, creative director at Digitas, says:
“Two feats of cultural vandalism in 24 hours – one self-inflicted by the artist, the other inflicted by those with no concern for art.
“‘The urge to destroy is also a creative urge’. Those famous words of Picasso were the comment that accompanied Banksy’s video, published over the weekend, depicting one of his artworks self-destructing after being sold for a nudge under $1.5 million.
“Perhaps all those in favour of transforming our ‘masterpiece of human genius’ (UNESCO’s words, not mine) into ‘the biggest billboard Sydney has’ (Mr Morrison et. al.) are simply feeling that same creative urge to destroy.
“Although our two sets of cultural vandals may be vastly different, they reaffirm the same point.
“Some things shouldn’t be for sale.”
Sarah Keith, managing director at Publicis Media Exchange:

Keith says: “I love the idea that national sports teams and events can be lauded or celebrated appropriately with messages and images”
“I echo Joseph Skrzynski with this commercialisation being at odds with the 2007 World Heritage status of the Opera House when he said: ‘The policy has been to be sparing in the use of the sails, they are not a billboard for hire… it has been lit up for cultural and community events which are consistent with the activities that occur at the Sydney Opera House. It’s not about being elite, it is about appropriate usage.’
“I am a huge fan of Vivid and the sails being a focal point in a winter arts festival that brings more than 2.5 million people to the heart of Sydney. I love the idea that national sports teams and events can be lauded or celebrated appropriately with messages and images.
“We have a thriving out of home industry here in Australia with many iconic sites such as the Glebe Island silos and the Coke sign at King’s Cross that immediately spring to mind. Each of these OOH companies works hard to build and install high quality panels that work sympathetically with each location; we don’t need the Opera House too!”
Toby Barbour, CEO at Starcom Australia, says:

Barbour says: “A commercial application to promote random brands or events seems about pure commercial gain”
“The Sydney Opera House is a World Heritage site, not to mention an iconic global landmark, and should be respected as such. It should invoke national pride and therefore support such causes or recognise national achievement. A commercial application to promote random brands or events seems about pure commercial gain for the individual brand or event and not the national agenda or pride. Lighting up the Opera House for Marriage Equality makes sense, or illuminated in pink for Breast Cancer month makes sense, as does a culturally relevant event such as Vivid or even the Olympic Games. But to promote a horse race, with the obvious subliminal undertones of gambling? I don’t think so, Scomo.”
Please stop. Greenie voters that are appalled but happy to also exist off the same industry that plasters billboards, screens and everything else that moves with ads. Duplicity at its worst.
User ID not verified.
I am a lover of music and I have attended some concerts and plays there. To associate the Australian icon for The Arts with horse racing and gambling is something I think no-one should accept. It is abhorrent. Alan Jones is the one to lose his job. He is quite disgusting!!!!!!
User ID not verified.
I won’t be surprised if a drone hovers in front of the projection tonight.
User ID not verified.
This kind of thing is the reason “that look” happens at a party when you say you work in advertising.
User ID not verified.
If you can’t see the difference between the two then you’re being naive.
User ID not verified.
We should remember the Opera House belongs to the people of Australia…NOT government, NOT advertising agencies and definitely NOT advertisers.OR Alan Jones and his cronies.
User ID not verified.
Gamling is likely Australia’s biggest social burden.
To even contemplate this on Gambling Awareness Week shows the disrespect for one of the nation’s largest problems.
Let’s empower some new thinking young Libs before this lot puts a Lottoland sign up at the Capital Hill and change the name to Puntralia.
User ID not verified.
Firstly the Opera House would not exist with out gambling. Check out the Lottery that financed it. Secondly all you protesters have given the event organisers more publicity than they could ever wished for – well done. Thirdly – there’s got to be more important stuff happening in the world !!
User ID not verified.
There are definitely protests planned.
User ID not verified.
I don’t work in advertising and I’m no fan of capitalism and commodification of everything, but in this case the advertisers and marketing people are at least aware of need to differeniate between spaces and how to distinguish significance of them. Whereas you don’t seem to be aware that there concepts such as appropriate, inappropriate uses and abuses and that is what most arguments are about in our culture. I assume you think it’s fine to turn the Opera House into a billboard? Besides the cultural question there’s also the priceless goodwill it (the OH) brings in tourism, reputation and of not advertising there. Or are those concepts also too tricky for you?
User ID not verified.
THIS.
User ID not verified.
Says Pete, someone who patently knows the cost of everything and the value of nothing.
User ID not verified.
Do we know the agency that booked the space?
User ID not verified.
The thing I find interesting is the lens that people view this issue through.
People like Our Glad, ScoMo, Jones etc. look through a purely financial lens. If there is money to be made then it is a good thing.
Others who say that this is not a good idea look through a social lens. If it is for the common good then that is OK.
Unfortunately we’re led by a bunch of accountants with little or no social conscience – it is all about the money. Bugger the climate. Forget the environment and the Great Barrier Reef. Strip back hospitals and schools but build footy stadiums. Cut the real value of the pension and Newstart but hand out corporate tax cuts.
This is just another example of accountants deciding our future. Name me one success story that is accountant led. You can’t.
User ID not verified.
Seems to me this straight out of the Wicked Vans marketing handbook. Well played Jones and you’re rich mates. News coverage? Tick. Outraged people ironically spreading the news? You bet. Seems too easy sometimes.
User ID not verified.
Good question. Just let me get my pitchfork and burning torch.
User ID not verified.
In 1925, Citroen hired the Eiffel Tower out as one giant billboard. During this time, the Tower was lit up each night with the word ‘Citroen’ emblazoned on its Seine-facing side.
And it ran for nine entire years, involving 250,000 lightbulbs and 600km of cable. By comparison, the planned Everest promotion will be a mere light projection lasting just one hour.
Get a life people!
User ID not verified.
How quickly you forget. The old coat hanger is the cultural icon of Sydney, and one of the great symbols of Australia; it serves as backdrop for a million fireworks and a massive light show every year, and we love it. The opera house is iconic, it is also beautiful in my opinion, though it has had a lock of flack and negative comment over the years.
Many of those who say “leave it alone” have probably never been inside it, and even more of them would avoid Opera like the plague.
It costs a huge amount of money to stage opera, and the opera house uses advertising in as many ways possible to promote its great art form. If there is a good income from allowing the use of the great white sails for tasteful* advertising, and the income benefits the opera companies, then “let it roll” I say.
* I would draw a line at hard retail “Be there” and Bronco type ads.
User ID not verified.
So your argument is that the public of Sydney 2018 should emulate the non-action of the public in Paris 1925?
Please rationalise that for us.
User ID not verified.
My comment is directed at contributors to this and other comment boards that the French would never consider advertising on an icon such as the Eiffel Tower.
User ID not verified.
I don’t mind the Sydney Opera House being used to promote a big horse race, i also think it should be used to promote men’s rights issues aswell. Where were the protesters when back in 2015 the sails of the Sydney Opera House were used to promote Australia rugby, and rugby, like horseracing, is a sport people over 18 years old can gamble on?.
User ID not verified.