Good riddance to the Bauers, the family that wrecked Australia’s magazine industry
Yesterday, Bauer Media closed eight of the most famous magazines in Australia. Mumbrella’s Tim Burrowes assesses where this leaves the industry.
It says a lot about how far – and how fast – the Australian magazine industry has fallen that when Bauer’s press release arrived on Tuesday morning, it didn’t come as a surprise.
Eight of the country’s most famous (and in some cases, most respected) magazines have closed.
From the top end of the market, Harper’s Bazaar, Elle and InStyle.
From the health sector, Men’s Health, Women’s Health and Good Health.
And from the trashier end, NW and OK.
I’ll remember InStyle for putting on one of the glitziest magazine gala nights I’ve been to.
I’ll think of Men’s Health as a motivational, and occasionally inspirational, source of reasons to get back on a health kick.
And NW will be remembered as the waste of space typified by its final cover – made up stories about Brad Pitt (not) having a lovechild, Tom Cruise (not) getting married, and Hamish Blake (not) expecting a third baby.
With the titles already suspended, there will be no final goodbye edition to readers.
But it will hopefully be the last piece of bad news we hear before the name Bauer disappears from the Australian media industry as the company rebrands in Australia and starts again under its new ownership.
And it seems fitting that the end should have come in as classless a way as possible, as that sums up the last eight years of Bauer family proprietorship.
When the COVID emergency led Bauer to suspend the magazine titles back in April, around 70 staff were made redundant and a similar number stood down.
At the time, few believed that the titles would come back, and others suspected the reason for suspending rather than closing was a cynical one.
Bauer told those stood down staff that it was unable to get them the government’s JobKeeper payments – the German parent company was either unwilling or unable to prove its revenues had fallen sufficiently for them to qualify.
It left those staff in a horrible limbo – without income but still technically employed.
The staff faced a dilemma – resign to try to access JobSeeker payments, or hang on in the hopes of a redundancy payout.
Now though, the Bauer family has left the building. The company is now in the hands of private equity firm Mercury Capital.
The sale was completed on Friday. And the first priority for the new owners was to do the humane thing and put the stood down staff out of their misery. I wonder how much the Bauers saved on the redundancy payments.
Next on the list – take down the Bauer sign from the offices in Park Street, Sydney. The name is tainted.
Soon the company once known as Australian Consolidated Press, then ACP Magazines, before it absorbed Emap Australia and Pacific Magazines along the way, will change its name once more.
It’s the end of a disastrous eight years which saw the Bauer family’s half a billion dollar purchase price incinerated – they got back less than a tenth of that when they sold to Mercury, and would have had several loss-making years along the way.
But this can’t be explained by bad timing.
Bauer completed the purchase in September 2012, from close-to-bankruptcy Nine Entertainment Co.
By then the worst of the GFC was over. Bauer should have known what it was getting into – all the trends for the magazine industry were already in place.
The Hamburg-based company, led by Yvonne Bauer, seemed to assume it could replicate the business models that worked so well in making it a powerhouse in Europe. This included strong reader revenues and cheap, repurposable content.
But they failed to take into account the Australian magazine market’s heavier reliance on advertising dollars rather than reader revenue.
They struggled with poor local management, including the notorious stint of CEO David Goodchild who continued to run H Bauer Publishing in the UK from the side of his desk too.
And they settled upon a baffling digital strategy which took the company into an online cul-de-sac from which it is yet to emerge.
Rather than building websites to make the most of its many famous mastheads, it launched the weaker, aggregated “Now to Love” network, consolidating content from the magazines.
Even today, a reader of Australian Women’s Weekly might go online to search for the title, but after one click would fall out of the AWW section, into Now To Love, and with a second click be stranded within Elle content. I just tried it, and that’s what happened to me.
That’s no way of building habits beyond print.
And that’s the biggest wound that Bauer will leave behind. The decade just gone was crucial for the traditional media to respond to the changing world. Radio dived into podcasting and streaming. Newspapers developed digital subscription strategies. The TV networks got into the video-on-demand game. The Australian magazine sector never got to grips with its present, let alone the future.
As the biggest player in the market even before the debacle of buying, then trying to renege on buying, Pac Mags, Bauer made the weather for the magazine sector locally.
Yet it did little of the heavy lifting required to market the medium, while rival sectors increased their investments.
Even as the television industry was getting its act together with the launch of Think TV, Magazine Publishers Australia – the alliance of Bauer, Pac Mags and News Corp – went backwards.
Eventually it became Magazine Networks and faded further from view until it became a trade marketing body with no permanent staff. The savings on this were costly for the whole sector.
It doesn’t matter how effective a medium is, or how passionate readers are – the message, heard and understood, from media agencies was that this was a medium in retreat. They invested their clients’ ad dollars elsewhere.
The signals of weakness from magazines were everywhere.
Bauer was a key player in the coordinated withdrawal by publishers from the Audited Media Association of Australia in 2016. Hating the quarterly trade press headlines about declining circulations, the magazine players seemed to figure that no coverage would be better than negative coverage.
It was a nuclear strike against transparency. So the medium disappeared even further from advertisers’ sights. The lack of bad news didn’t stop the agencies turning away from magazines – they simply forgot they were there.
And along the way, Bauer kept on closing titles. The list of mastheads they closed over the last eight years is longer than the list of those still open.
Eight in a day is still some kind of record though.
It ends the relationship with US company Hearst, which licensed many of those brands including Harper’s Bazaar, Elle, Men’s Health and Women’s Health.
I suspect that’s a reason why those mastheads – along with InStyle, licensed from Meredith Corporation – were particularly vulnerable.
In good times, that sort of franchise deal makes sense – the local publisher gets syndicated international content and just as importantly, familiarity for the international fashion brands as an appropriate place to advertise.
With franchised titles, a publisher is usually committed not only to sharing a certain percentage of revenue (perhaps 8%) with the masthead owner, but also they may be expected to deliver a minimum guarantee. In this market, who’d give that?
However, the closures also signal a punctuation mark.
CEO Brendon Hill has, until now, been a middle manager, forced to apologise (or more often remain silent) for the decisions of his bosses in Germany. The embarrassment of trying to avoid completing the Pac Mags purchase must have been excruciating.
Now though, he works for Mercury, not the Bauer family. We’ll get to see what he can achieve with a supportive owner.
Often, being owned by private equity can spell bad news for staff. The model can be to strip out costs, artificially drive up profits and exit on a higher multiple in four or five years.
That won’t work for Mercury. There’s little fat left to cut. They’ll need to nurture the company instead.
And it helps that they paid so little for the asset. That means that once the company returns to profitability, there will be more dollars to invest in growth rather than repaying the original investment.
Soon, the company will have a new name. And it will still be Australia’s biggest magazine publisher.
And it owns some of the greatest media properties of all time. Australian Women’s Weekly, the jewel in the crown, still carries immense kudos. Luckily, brands are hard to kill.
Nonetheless, it’s a horrible time to be setting out on the journey. Advertising revenues were down for the sector by nearly 40% in April and 33% in June. Like the joke about the lost tourist looking for directions, if I were them, I wouldn’t start from here.
Nonetheless, it is a new start.
Thanks Tim
Good recap of the tumultuous journey that is Bauer Media in Australia.
Should run a comp about what the new name should/could be?
Winner gets a a year’s FREE subscription to the remaining publications – here are some to kick things off
– Mercury Magazines
– Love Magazines
– Australian Magazines Co
– My Magazines Co
– The Magazine Co
Over to your creative followers…
User ID not verified.
Great read – more of this on Mumbrella pls.
User ID not verified.
Maybe we should follow the baffling ‘Here, There and Everywhere” possibly “Seen but not Heard’ ?
User ID not verified.
While I might agree with the politics, blaming Bauer for the decline in sales of magazines across the board, across the globe – is more than a tad ridiculous.
The fact of the matter is, that consumers get their information from social media, usually for free – instead of purchasing a printed magazine that is already out of date when they buy it, and which is seen as killing trees to produce the paper.
Blame the internet for killing magazines.
Blame the inability of journalists and media owners to see the bleeding obvious for at least two decades.
Seriously, anyone who could NOT see this coming should not be in media or jounalism.
User ID not verified.
Great article, would also like to point out re; tarnished name, that Bauer Media pulled out of New Zealand April 2 with no explanation, blamed it on Covid, denied government support and put 250 people out of work in the middle of a pandemic.
The Australian office will be running select New Zealand titles, and closing the rest. Sad for NZ’s already small media industry.
User ID not verified.
Outstanding summation, Tim. The Bauer family’s withdrawal from publishing was far more a sign of incompetent ownership than actual difficulties.
User ID not verified.
That’s not what Tim said. He said that the Bauer family applied a European model to a different context. The US magazine market, for example, is a wildly different beast from the Australian market. And thinking that most people get what they want from social media is simply erroneous.
The internet hasn’t killed magazines – a vast number of indie mags are flourishing. What HAS killed magazines is an inability to adapt and rethink the model.
Which is partly what the Bauer family failed to do.
User ID not verified.
Good summary of what transpired. I worked at ACP etc for close for 40 years and loved my time there until the Bauer family took over, a company that believed their formula was right and no interest in the local market and what made it tick, arrogant.
I did have the good fortune to work with Brendon Hill when he was in Finance department and he always took an interest to understand what drove the advertising business and he was alway happy to engage. I’m confident with his knowledge and people skills he can lead the business successfully for the future.
User ID not verified.
Story by Tim Elliott in Good Weekend in the SMH published 3 weeks ago has much of this analysis and more
https://www.smh.com.au/national/how-a-german-media-company-brought-australia-s-greatest-magazine-empire-to-its-knees-20200622-p5551c.html
User ID not verified.
Great read, Tim.
Another point to add to this – I was told by a senior Bauer executive back in 2016 that both NW and OK were to close, due to their very poor circulations and that profits from other titles were needed to keep them both afloat. Then there was a change of heart and both titles kept going.
The fact both NW and OK were allowed to continue this long, draining the finances from other successful titles in the stable, is yet another example of bad management by Bauer.
I am sorry for anyone who has lost their jobs, but the closure of NW and OK in particular was long overdue.
User ID not verified.
I always used to say that Print Media was like the person falling out of an aeroplane: they can keep saying “I’m not dead” quite correctly for a while.
But.
Right now, it’s dead.
It IS true to say the sheetmusic business is still alive, you can buy sheetmusic still.
But it isn’t the revenue powerhouse it once was when entertainment was playing the family piano at home.
Radio, which took over (publishers got singers to record their songs to boost sheetmusic sales) is also dead.
Sure, there are still radio stations, but not like the glory days of Jack Davey and Bob Dyer.
Cinemas are pretty dead too. No longer do we go to the flicks every Saturday.
And Television is determined to shoot itself in the foot with repeats of shows made decades ago and hours devoted to Home Shopping.
On demand is the new powerhouse for eyeballs. But even Foxtel is slipping, with its higher cost, black box installation and wires on every street. At least they offer Foxtel Go.
Look at it this way: my Dad subscribed to newspapers every day of his life. SMH and “The Three on Sunday”.
I’ve subscribed occasionally.
My kids never have.
User ID not verified.
Mirrors my sentiment entirely.
User ID not verified.
The Hamburg-based company, led by Yvonne Bauer, seemed to assume it could replicate the business models that worked so well in making it a powerhouse in Europe.
This included strong reader revenues and cheap, repurposable content
.BauerAustralia
MD Yvonne Bauer
The devil wears Witchery
Not Prada!
CH – Former GM Jalou Media Group France in A+NZ
User ID not verified.
I was made redundant last year Bauer only give the bare redundancy according to Australia law and I was there for nearly 20 years it would have been nice to be given a bit extra,the best years were the ACP Magazines and when Kerry Packer was alive and when Bauer took over they didn’t know a thing about the Australian market and how many CEO did they have? Even Nik Chan tried to fix the place but they wouldn’t listen to him and he had so much experience in the magazine business
User ID not verified.
Hear, hear!
Well put Tim.
As an ex Bauer and ex PacMags staff member, my heart breaks for the staff.
User ID not verified.
Mostly correct, but the reason Bauer wanted to get into Australia was to combine magazines with FM radio here (similar shitty celeb gossip content). They failed to find anyone willing to sell FM radio at the time. Prior to all this though was the fundamental mistake that Herr Bauer made in gifting the business to his daughter in the first place. The devalue that’s occured in Australia is mirrored worldwide for them.
User ID not verified.
Nice summary.
Now let’s talk about how Pacific/Seven contributed to the demise of magazines in this country by selling to Bauer.
The Pac staff were horribly, horribly betrayed by management, and so were the readers.
Unlike Bauer, Pacific had a relatively strong digital strategy – New Idea alone used to double and often triple the audience of Bauer’s entire Now To Love platform.
When Seven sold Pacific to Bauer, almost all of the Pacific digital staff were immediately sacked for short term savings, effectively ending any hope that major Australian magazines could have a digital future.
Yes, Bauer killed the Australian magazine industry, but Seven handed them the knife – and no one directly involved is going to forget it.
User ID not verified.
Very interesting and informative piece.
User ID not verified.
Every survey of online readers I have done since closing the print edition of Australian Videocamera yells “We prefer print”. Maybe it’s because my content is niche? I don’t know.
Oh and by the way, subscribers will never make a publication profitable. Barely pay for the ink in real terms.
What I *do* know is that I didn’t close the print edition due to lack of readership; I closed it due to the costs of printing and lack of advertising as advertisers were convinced (and to a degree duped) that online was the only way to go.
Which everyone who has been in the mag biz knows is utter and absolute crap.
User ID not verified.
What we all forget in this saga is that German culture and nature is so far removed from entertainment, style, and editorial depth (without the density of the Frankfurter Allgemeine). They have never been able to make a comedy movie that traveled internationally, and never succeeded in fashion like the French, Italians, and Americans / English. The Bauer group came out of a lower grade magazine DNA and was always doomed in the western world media of high cover prices for quality product.
Yet as a media analyst for decades and intimate with the Private Equity culture, nothing could be worse than a private equity player to follow Bauer. Always from passion comes success no matter which direction an industry may be heading. PE is never a passion player.
User ID not verified.
The question is: why would Mercury buy such a basket case of a business?
Can it even be saved without closing even more titles? Is it even worth saving? Commercial mags have had their day. Let’s put them to bed …. along with the arrogant and toxic weekly category management team, forever.
Amen.
User ID not verified.
Great article and some great comments. Regardless of Bauer ownership, magazines are in freefall at about 14% year on year. But that stat is also fraught in that it is circulation and does not take into account newsagents return their unsold mags for refund, so it is way beyond that. Newsagents no longer position magazines in their real estate in prime spots, sadly like newspapers (but that is a story for another day). To respond to that freefall by making their magazines central to fake news, has only accelerated their demise. The only good news is that a well articled magazine will always sells. We are just getting rid of the riff-raff at last. Now, to start on News Corp ……
User ID not verified.
A forgotten point in the article is that the titles cut are all joint ventures and/ or licenses….. most of the deals were cut in good times, some with what now look like generous terms to the brand owners. The internet has meant you can get foreign content that these magazines provide on the owners’ websites…. and some deals struck in the 80’s and 90’s didn’t properly cover digital let alone social ….
User ID not verified.
Who’s spending hours on Home Shopping via television? As opposed to online shopping?
User ID not verified.
I worked at ACP back in the 90s – what wonderful days they were. Without doubt the fondest memories I have of working life.
User ID not verified.
Wouldn’t recommend the use of magazines in the title. They need to position themselves as brands rather than their legacy medium
User ID not verified.
It’s a perfectly reasonable price to pay solely for the AWW brand. Anything else is gravy. They got a bargain.
User ID not verified.
The Bauer ‘SAGA’ reminds me of the Miley Cyrus song which goes something like ‘…they came in like a Wrecking Ball’. Bauer, from the moment they arrived did nothing other than destroy a great magazine industry, the great people who worked in it (like me in the early 2,000’s) and leave a string of carnage and distaste for everyone, everything and every business they touched or did business with – even attempting to damage one of Australia’s greatest exports – Rebel Wilson – on the way through… all I can say is: Good Riddance – dont come back…
User ID not verified.
This is true for me too. I edit a niche magazine. Whenever we do a reader survey, about 70 per cent of respondents say they would prefer a print version of the publication over digital.
Print has so much power. You cannot leave a digital publication on a politician’s desk, or encounter it in the reception of one of your stakeholders. It’s difficult to incidentally encounter a digital version of a magazine, which is one reason why the internet is littered with the detritus of so many of them.
I’m surprised none of the comments on here have mentioned Monocle magazine, the masthead at the centre of one of the world’s most successful publishing empires, which was actually launched just before the GFC hit.
Founder Tyler Brule’s philosophy is “print done well”, which is something Bauer failed to understand. You cannot compromise on the quality of your journalism, photography, design – even paper stock.
And of course print must integrate well with your complementary digital offering.
Savvy marketers understand there is still a place for advertising in print, and that place is in print done well.
User ID not verified.
I can’t imagine.
I have the feeling that if “Home Shopping” on TV actually sold products, we would be seeing more companies get aboard.
The Stations make money from the businesses offering the products.
User ID not verified.
“Seen but not Hearst” ?
User ID not verified.
Bauer have proven to be completely inept at the business, lacking vision and making inexplicable decisions. Horrible for all the individuals impacted now and in the past.
But lets not let forget that the decline predated them, previous leaders and managers were slow to adapt, easy to blame others than look in the mirror.
User ID not verified.
The old joke of how to start a small business has been adapted to the publishing world. Buy a large business and reduce the number of mastheads.
Many of the commenters have said what I would like to say. The only time I have ever read a magazine ‘in depth’ was at the doctor’s surgery.
Other than that, I would stroll around the supermarket, go past the “news stands” and survey the titles of the magazines. Then I would look at the front page of the publication.
Generally the front cover has an apparent sensational headline about a celebrity, sporting couple or a member of the royal family. For example a few years ago there would be a story of a sporting couple’s rocky marriage. That would be repeated over the years. Go inside and the story would go for nor more than two pages, with the bulk of the pages devoted to photographs.
After a few stories about the same “rocky marriage”, you instinctively ‘feel’ that these kinds of stories are a pack of lies. The couple in reality are nevertheless in a happy marriage. Goodness, what does it do to the family in question and all the relatives and friends of the sporting couple. This is totally calumnus. Discussion of the topic not only lowers the publisher but also lowers the reader gossiping about the story. What happens to society’s values when many violate the commandment “Thou shalt not bear false witness against others” ?
In addition how do we know whether the photos are recycled not depicting the supposed current story or altered with software? This is same as telling lies in picture form.
The Media Watch program has been covering stories about fake stories and photos in magazines.
https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/nw—the-art-of-fabrication—episode-22/9971096
https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/mags/11647506
Even if there is “fake news” does not justify lying about people whether in print or on social media or blogs or electronic publications.
Thank you,
Anthony of exciting Belfield
User ID not verified.
A really interesting insight into a once-glamorous industry. I hope we can see an invigoration and repurposing of some of Australias best brands. They’re sitting on a lot of branding goodwill, which recently has been mismanaged.
It’s time to focus on what customers want, the revenue will come with strong content and engaged readers.
User ID not verified.
The huge criticism – right from the start – on NW’s Instagram account by its readers was actually encouraging. The same annoyance was seen on New Idea’s site. Totally underestimated their market. There’s just not enough junk audience here. Middle market’ll get you every time!
User ID not verified.
Bauer has been a problem for quite some time.
I refused to buy anything much that was related to this silly company. They told BS from start to finish, and New Idea is one of the worst. I can’t believe its taken this long to go downhill. If I wanted to read BS, I’d want to buy a mag that specifies that, not some trashy mags at double their worth!!
I hope a better company can pick it up and improve the quality.
User ID not verified.