Masterchef: Homophobic? No. Racist? No. Ageist? Maybe
In this guest posting, Tactical TV’s Tony Richardson argues that Masterchef shows Australian TV audiences are ready for multiculturalism but not older faces
When the popularity of a TV show bumps the prime minister and the leader of the opposition to an earlier time slot, you know you have a phenomenon.
Only 12 months ago I wrote that the Masterchef franchise is a marketer’s research study made in heaven. Without spending a cent every marketer in Australia gets to see the sort of people that Australians like to see. Researching a quarter of the population would normally be impossible.
Former blockbuster TV shows like Australian Idol let the viewer decide who stayed and who went. That meant handing control over to the 13-year-old girls who could be bothered to vote. This skewed result gave us a view of who 13-year-old girls liked. Fine, if that’s your market.
If MC1 was an experiment that worked beyond all expectations, MC2 is a far more controlled offering – in terms of contestants. And if you think it’s a cooking show where the best cook wins think again.
Rather than let the punters stuff up the ratings, Masterchef executives held an iron grip on the talent. Initial selection threw up a bunch of 24 ‘made for TV faces’ and personalities.
For marketers Masterchef 2 became an exercise in demonstrating Australian diversity, or more importantly what TV viewers will now accept as diverse.
Isn’t it great that in one of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world, we can see on commercial TV, a few people whose name isn’t Smith or Johnson.
Indeed, compared to most Aussie TV fare, Masterchef is positively multicultural. We had contestants with ethnic links to Japan, Malaysia and India. We had Greek and Italian surnames. Heck, we even had a contestant with Arabic heritage.
The final six included an openly gay man (Alvin) and a ‘sort of, for the moment’ gay woman (Courtney). Talk about real life. Not so long ago this would have been a subject for intense media scrutiny. Now it’s just … there.
General attractiveness almost goes without saying, but I’ll say it anyway. On Australian TV ‘pretty’ is normal and ‘average’ is ugly. The poms can handle crooked teeth and wrinkles. It would seem we can’t.
‘Personality’ seems to be better differentiated this time. In MC1 the final three consisted of Chris the villain versus pretty, creative Po and/or homely mumsy Julie. Chris was never going to win.
This time round we seem able to accommodate more dimension of personality. Callum was nervous and earnest but a surprisingly good cook. Claire was a perfectionist to the point of breakdown. Adam, a slow starter, sprinted to the finish. And Jimmy cheerfully (and unaccountably) created a curry for every occasion.
So it’s all multicultural, accepting of different sexuality, friendly and fun. Right? Not so fast.
Age continues to be a barrier to on-screen success. There were admittedly two over-40s in the gang of 24. A genuine slice of Australia would have had 12! But of course that would never happen. And predictably the token oldies were quickly eliminated.
It seems young Australians like to watch young faces and older Australians do too. If you want old faces watch Midsomer Murders over on the ABC.
The first Masterchef ended a year ago. But it seems like last century. Back then we found out the homely and mumsy were attributes Australians liked.
This time round Australia’s TV consumers have voted for:
Adam – Creative without being zany, adventurous without being foolhardy, unusual without being threatening.
But they also really, really liked:
Callum – Youthful without being brash, keen without being a crawler, hardworking without being a bore.
A focus group of 4 million Australians has spoken. We’d be mad not to listen.
- Tony Richardson is the Creative Director of TacticalTV
What’s to say a “geniune slice of Australia” applied to the show in the first place?
Surely younger people are more likely to apply to be on a reality television show that would involve them moving from home to live in a shared house with other contestants, leaving their jobs and living away from their families for months?
User ID not verified.
Nice piece Tony, thanks for a good read.
User ID not verified.
A woolly, confusing and pointless article — what exactly is the point here?
And some strange statements:
“… predictably the token oldies were quickly eliminated.”
Maybe there aren’t so many older people involved because it’s a little harder to put your career on hold at that stage in life? And you’ve probably found a career that suits you, along with a mortgage?
“This time round Australia’s TV consumers have voted for …”
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I was under the impression that the judges did the voting rather than the Australian public? I guess it’s possible that the makers of the show are trying to second-guess consumers’ likes and dislikes, that’s all. But that’s what television is, isn’t it?
4/10.
User ID not verified.
Thank you for your insights into the Fairfax app and Masterchef phenomena today – unfortunately, that’s all I can stomach with your client’s distracting advertisement – a woman’s bent-forward backside in virginal underpants (so incongruous in the “ready for doggy-style sex” context) intermittently swelling and shrinking beside the principal text column. Turn it off and I’ll come back.
User ID not verified.
I came home and watched a recording of the Melbourne v Sydney game I had just been at. Now that’s good television.
User ID not verified.
Could it also be that people over 40 are less likely to want to give up their lives for 4 months to move into a share house and bare all on TV? When you’re in your 40s, 50s etc.. you’ve got an established career with decent money, a family, more responsibilities. There wouldn’t be many who would want to swap all that for a chef apprenticeship wage (which is all most of the MasterChef wannabes could hope for). That’s not to say people in their 40s or 50s shouldn’t do it if that’s what they want, but I bet there were more people applying for MasterChef in their twenties than in their forties.
User ID not verified.
How old was Julie last year’s winner? Close to 40 if not over it? She may be “mumsy” but your point is on age right and she won…
User ID not verified.
ps – agree with “jbb”. I’m reading this at work – don’t want a female butt flashing on my screen!
User ID not verified.
Well I do and don’t agree with some of Tony’s posted comments about the show.
Masterchef has become a ratings bulldozer espechally when up against a couple of staid boring politicians who in all honesty very few people really give a stuff about.
Unlike other “reality TV shows” this is friendly television not some imported American ideal of how everyone has to be competitive, back stabbing trolls.
That in itself is a winning thing just being friendly. We live in a friendly society built around a collective known as a neighbourhood. The idea of being selfish is quite alien to most of us, we are plesant people as a whole. Most of us live in places where we know who our neighbours are. Masterchef became an extension of our neighbourhood.
MC1 knocked our socks off but one year on Po most definately was the go-getter who has really won while frumpy Julie faded away as her only idea fizzled out.
But then again Po is not stuck on the central coast with a family to keep under control so she can most certainly be a lot more managable as a product.
The coming months will be interesting to see how Adam & Callum navigate through all the media attention sliding back in to a normal life in to a very hard industry to crack.
User ID not verified.
Can you please frequency capp that bum ad? It’s annoying me too.
User ID not verified.
“Isn’t it great that in one of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world, we can see on commercial TV, a few people whose name isn’t Smith or Johnson.”
Amen Mr Richardson.
Australian programming (including most ads) doesn”t come close to reflecting our experienced reality or our future. Programmers and agencies are undiverse, so unsurprisingly their work is too (for the most part). But it’s great to see this changing (at least on the programming side).
Masterchef is a breath of fresh air. Wthout tokenism or being patronisingly “inclusive”, its diversity feels real and natural (because it is).
While Vuvuzela Gillard and the Blinking Budgie Smuggler make me feel like I’m living in the 1950s, Masterchef (truly) makes me feel happy to be living here.
User ID not verified.
There are ads on the Internet? Who knew? Certainly no one using firefox with adblock. I could never go back to an Internet crawling with bad ads.
User ID not verified.
Until you remove that bum, i too am not reading at the moment….it is soo annoying and makes me cringe while i am eating my chocolate!! as for mas terchef, must have missed all that…I found it all too contrived… great posts thanks:)
User ID not verified.
I hears ya!
We’ll dial back the rotation of the Lunch Partners ad a bit… (for what it’s worth it’s delviering one of our highest ever percentage clickthroughs… )
Cheers,
Tim – Mumbrella
As good as Tony’s last efforts on the rules of gurilla marketing. Just boring, and if I had read it properly probably wrong.
Tim does tactical TV advertise on Mumbrella?
User ID not verified.
@Her,
That’s pretty harsh. I wonder if you’d express those opinions in person? I generally consider that it’s poor form to say things/behave online in a manner that I wouldn’t otherwise do in the flesh (like people who leave a restaurant having not complained – and therefore given the opportunity for their problem to be addressed – and then absolutely trash it to all and sundry on review sites/social media when they get home).
Same goes for @Chris (No.3).
And no, I have no connection with the guy.
User ID not verified.
A great read, Tony. Loved your descriptions of the contestants–how I would have described them myself if I was, well, a more amusing writer! What else could we expect from Ten, though, in terms of ageism. It does have a young demographic, when all’s said and done. The annual crop of Big Brother contestants used to reflect this, so did Idol (perhaps to a lesser extent). Was seen very clearly when the crossovers with international Big Brother houses in England especially were shown.
And, Tim, the Big Bum ad is a really good example of bad advertising: I don’t look at it longer than an nanosecond before I click somewhere (anywhere!) else to get away from it. So it’s not doing its job because I don’t know what it’s for–I just know it’s abuminable (sorry. couldn’t help myself).
User ID not verified.
@mick learn to spell. Or at least use spellcheck.
User ID not verified.
@mumbrella The bum ad may be getting click throughs – but I doubt the ad is working. I kept seeing it next to all the news items (and yes, as it gets larger is it quite distracting) so curiosity got the best of me and I clicked through. However, the intro pages took so long to load that that I closed it, still not having a clue what they do.
User ID not verified.
I clicked through on the bum ad too, just because it was so freaking horrible. The page that eventually came up didn’t satisfy any curiousity. The clickthroughs may be great, but I’ve read less than half the posts I normally would since it’s been up.
User ID not verified.
Agree with the others – that ad on the side is unbelievably irritating.
User ID not verified.
An article about advertising made unreadable by an ad about something that is not immediately apparent. Haemorrhoid cream? Underpants?
User ID not verified.
Hi 19/20/21 & 22,
Thanks for the feedback. The ad is for Lunch Partners.
It was the winner (as voted by Mumbrella readers) of our recent contest with Thinkstock to create an agency ad: https://mumbrella.com.au/lunch-partners-wins-agency-ad-contest-29476
As it happens, it has delivered one of the highest percentage clickthroughs on Mumbrella since we began. (Which at least shows it was a deserving winner!)
For those who aren’t fans, you’ll be glad to know that the 100,000 impressions that were part of the prize have now nearly been delivered.
Cheers,
Tim – Mumbrella
For what it’s worth, I think the ad is flabulous (yes, following in Sharon’s footsteps, can’t help it!). I definitely clicked through, although couldn’t exactly work out what these guys do, and also couldn’t find any contact info.
I was trying to work out if there is any correlation between Lunch Partners and Naked, as Naked’s activation arm in the U.K. is called Lunch. Something tells me though that Naked aren’t looking to expand their business at this point in time!
User ID not verified.
Haha I just kept running the mouse over her backside to see the thighs grow, thinking hmmm I must get to the gym. Maybe it would be a great ad to put next to a story on the Biggest Loser! Didn’t bother clicking through though.
User ID not verified.