Opinion

Media planners should embrace the rise of slow TV

PHD's Jack Monro and Gabrielle Peters sit down for a chat about slow TV and its impact on advertising, media planning and the nation's anxiety levels.

Jack: I don’t get it.

Gab: Shhhh…

Jack: What am I watching here?

Gab: It’s a non-stop cruise along the Norwegian coast, in real time, for 134 hours straight. People are calling it slow TV; a non-stop livestream of an everyday event with no added sound, narrative or special effects. Just sit back and enjoy the world sailing past…

Jack: Oh, is this the same kind of thing as The Ghan on SBS the other night?

The Ghan screened for 17 hours on SBS Viceland

Gab: Yep.

Jack: Absolute madness.

Gab: No. Absolute Norway. The Ghan was inspired by the success of this genre created in Norway. This video ‘Hurtigruten minutt for minutt’, was so popular when it aired live in 2011 that more than half of the entire Norwegian population tuned in.

Jack: Wait a minute. You said it was for 134 hours straight. Doesn’t that just mean that half the population were channel surfing and happened to flick by?

Gab: Well, the ratings of the Hurtigruten show peaked at 692,000 viewers, so although 3.2 million people did watch at some point, the viewing wasn’t consistent. Whatever the case, it became a phenomenon, with crowds gathered on the coast to see it go by and even three wedding proposals captured along the trip. 

They still have one or two slow TV events per year that get consistently solid viewership. This year, they were tracking reindeer migrating. However, they had to cancel it when the reindeer stopped moving altogether. Apparently, slowness has a limit. Other countries have gotten in on the (lack of) action too! People from the UK were treated to voiceless documentaries depicting a man making a knife, people doing pottery and someone whittling a chair.

Jack: Sounds… fun?

Gab: Well, the Ghan had mixed reviews from viewers with some describing it as “absolute rubbish… So slow and monotonous” to “just think, not one pseudo celebrity, no renovation, no ruling kitchens, not a chef in sight, no politicians… it was almost perfect”. It will be interesting to see if it becomes as popular globally as it is in Norway.

Jack: It reminds me of those 24/7 livestreams on YouTube, where thousands of people watch weird stuff like people trying to get across a large puddle in Newcastle, or an intersection in Jackson Hole, USA, or animals just chilling in the zoo. There’s even a seven-hour YouTube preroll ad where one can literally watch grass grow.

Gab: Weirdly, it’s the online participation that makes it such a phenomenon. Even though the slowness of these shows is in direct opposition to the fast, dopamine-driving and addictive cycle of social media, it’s that same social media that makes them such popular events. The people watching them create a running commentary on what’s happening on-screen as it (slowly) progresses. These online communities can get huge. When the Queen of Norway got on her yacht and chased down the Hurtigurten for a cameo, Norwegian Twitter was so overwhelmed it crashed.

Jack: This is all very interesting, but the real question is – how is anyone supposed to make money off it? The Ghan rated consistently above 300k viewers (eTAM, min by min, consolidated data) with a peak of 601k, numbers not to be sniffed at. But are commercial channels REALLY going to embrace a day-long television show that has no narrative and no ads whatsoever? Even if it has the potential to be picked up on social media and become a nationwide event?

Gab: It would equate to a huge chunk of lost revenue – having hours of ad-free airtime. They’d either run ads in it, which would ruin the whole hypnotic flow essential to the genre, or they would need to monetise it in unusual ways.

Jack: Agreed. Sponsorships, product placement, or maybe even an entire show would be made by a brand. I’d bet The Ghan is loving all this free press and that passenger numbers have skyrocketed since they’ve aired the show.

Gab: Yeah tourism, travel and auto brands would surely be interested in getting behind this trend. Imagine the hijinks in a six-hour video of a family of five, driving an Amarok V6 across the Nullarbor Plains or along the Great Ocean Road. Or Tourism Australia, putting a camera on the back of a turtle swimming around the Great Barrier Reef.

Jack: I would definitely watch a turtle hitch a ride on the East Australia Current. Actually, Scotch Distillery Lagavulin already got Nick Offerman to sit by a roaring fire and silently drink whiskey for 45 minutes straight. It’s now got 3.4 million views.

Gab: But as a media planner, would you embrace slow TV events or avoid them?

Jack: If it’s not central to the campaign, I’d probably plan around those TV events, like you would plan around sporting events. But if the idea is there to use it properly, it’s an exciting and fresh way to talk to people in a traditional channel like TV.

Gab: So essentially, we all need to embrace the changing consumer landscape with creative and innovative ideas?

Jack: Yep. That’s the outcome. That’s our opinion on this one.

Gab: Sounds good. See you in another 133 hours when I’ve finished watching this cruise. It’s just so much more exciting than my own life.

Jack: Good point. I might watch it with you.

Jack Morno is planning manager, Unilever and Gabrielle Peters is planning executive, Unilever at PHD.

ADVERTISEMENT

Get the latest media and marketing industry news (and views) direct to your inbox.

Sign up to the free Mumbrella newsletter now.

 

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing.