What I wish I knew before I started my agency
Anyone who has started a business has their own take on what to embrace and what to avoid in the first year, but Simon Rutherford says step one is to avoid working with start-ups.
Running a successful agency is about finding a balance between vision and focus. You have to be able to focus and block out the distractions to achieve the vision you have for your agency.
I have learned so many things as the owner of an independent agency; however, if I was to share one lesson, and only one it would be this: don’t work with start-ups (unless they can prove they are well funded).
When we started Slingshot seven years ago, we were 10-feet tall and bullet proof. We were also incredibly entrepreneurial (or so we thought), and would take on pretty much any opportunity that came through the door.
To a degree you have to do that when you’re first starting out. I’m incredibly satisfied with what we have achieved; however, if I was to change anything it would be to take back all the time we spent working with other start-ups, because in reality we were just helping other businesses grow while taking the focus away from substantively growing our own business quicker.
The issue is one of opportunity cost. The time spent on working for start-ups, particularly those with little ability to pay the bills, could have gone straight into building sales and pursuing clients who could actually remunerate us fairly and on time.
I remember a colleague coming to me in our fourth year of business. He had just started his own creative agency and wanted my opinion about working with another start-up. After telling me about the start-up, he asked what I thought.
I said, “It looks a great idea on paper, however I am going to give you some advice, pass on it and focus on establishing your own business”. He was not expecting that reaction.
I explained that his priority right now as a new business owner was to pay the office rent, salaries, infrastructure costs and no doubt his mortgage and other expenses. Working with this start-up would only drain the business of valuable time that could and should be spent chasing down paying clients, and ultimately would deliver little compensation in the foreseeable future.
So if you are a new agency owner you need to ask yourself one question… will this new client put cash into my bank account next month? If the answer is no, then you’d better have deep pockets.
Instead you should be focusing on building your sales pipeline and getting new business through the door that can pay their bills. It’s a frightening proposition, certainly.
There is an understandable tendency to grab any work you can when you’re just starting out, but in the long run it will only prove to be a distraction and one that could ultimately damage the development of your own start-up.
Once you are established (five years plus), you can then allocate time to more speculative opportunities.
Simon Rutherford is CEO of media agency Slingshot and guest speaker on the ‘What I wish I knew before I started my agency’ panel at this year’s SAGE conference.
its interesting that even more established businesses look to take risks dealing with small clients that cant pay – to chase their elusive growth targets.
owners of independent agencies know this as it directly affects their profits if clients dont pay.
in the world of multinational companies, local CEOs and managers in charge do not feel any pain of clients not paying, so they are free to take more risks. Some do so wit vigour
User ID not verified.
imagine brands felt the same about slingshot when it started in Sydney, and now in Melbourne.
“Let’s not work with them – they’re too speculative for now. Let’s wait til they have some real clients here.”
A very dismissive generalisation Simon …
User ID not verified.
I think this article is somewhat entrenched in the old models and ways of agency remuneration. The real, raw opportunity of working with start-ups as an agency is the opportunity to get involved and put real skin in the game from the very beginning. To also evolve your agencies offering outside of traditional comms remit. The success of that business should prove to be your own businesses success if you frame the relationship and opportunity properly. Sure, not every start-up works out, but if the up-side is your up-side as much as theirs, then I’ve no doubt you’ll be wanting to work harder for its success rather than looking at it as an opportunity cost.
User ID not verified.
What this really shows is a lack of judgement. Choosing to work with the wrong startups.
User ID not verified.
Well, that’s their choice to pass on Slingshot. An agreement requires two parties to agree. If I was a business owner I sure as hell want to get paid. Simon made the right choice. And stay away from restaurants too. They are also a pain. And religious organisations.
User ID not verified.
Well reasoned article, Simon. Some commentators clearly don’t understand the meaning of opportunity cost, or have never had to pay people’s salaries with their own money.
Another way to think of it: startups are inherently risky. So startups working with (or for) other startups just compounds the risk. In this case, risk shared isn’t risk mitigated – it’s risk multiplied.
User ID not verified.
Nice one Ruthers – it’s always going to be about balance. Some clients are worth taking the risk so you get the experience in their business, others pay the bills and want your experience.
User ID not verified.