If you want to stop reading this type of article, stop reading this type of article
In this post, Cathie McGinn argues why rewarding the hateful with mainstream media attention perpetuates social media misbehaviour…
In this weekend’s Sunday Telegraph, soi-disant “Tabloid Terror,” gossip columnist Ros Reines devoted almost a full page to calling A Current Affair host Tracy Grimshaw a hypocrite for her criticism of “social media bullies.”
In essence, it’s a non-story, much like Grimshaw’s original tirade, and in fact, if you keep on going down the rabbit hole, you find yourself lost in the cold dark emptiness of a desolate planet, much like that ad for Tooheys, wandering in and out of a series of increasingly drab house parties where all the booze has run dry.
“Why translate their jaundiced opinions and intemperate language into news copy that’s supposed to actually carry some authority?” asks Grimshaw. Without getting into a debate about the editorial policies of ACA and Today Tonight, this attack on internet users is just the latest in a long line of what could best be described as social media hothoused hype.
Foolish behaviour on the internet is time and again being given not just the oxygen of attention but a thorough stirring up by the hot panting breath of hundreds of journalists.
It may appear that I’m doing the very thing I’m criticising: some sort disappointing online version of pass-the-parcel, where you open box after box after box, the last in the series of increasingly tiny boxes finally revealing nothing at all. And full disclosure is required: I’ve appeared on national television and in print, offering criticism of the twats on Twitter and fuckwits on Facebook who offer death threats and alarming calls for savagery and violence because they don’t like some bloke on the telly.
I’ve said in a grave and overly earnest fashion that the way we use the internet is evolving; we’re effectively acting like teenagers, testing boundaries and learning as we go. I’ve taken the view that any new technology that has widespread impact on society will inevitably cause consternation for a while.
Change creates fear.
But we’ve had the internet for a while now, and I’m getting bored of waiting for us to grow up.
I’m coming around to a new way of thinking: it’s the mainstream media overblowing of this trend that I believe is cementing its position in our society and offering it legitimacy, and shifting the focus away from the underlying issues. Why, for example, are people so fed up, in this lucky country of ours, that one hair flip of a minor celebrity gets them baying for blood?
Twitter or Facebook, or news sites that allow comments on articles such as this one aren’t causing people to behave in a stupid manner, any more than it’s the fault of Ford that people crash their cars while drunk at the wheel. But there surely has to be some sort of positive reinforcement in seeing a negative remark you’ve made being repeated ad nauseam on broadcast media, something which makes you more likely to aim for greater vitriol.
I don’t believe the majority of people do want to see Delta suffer a Game of Thrones style fate. I think people are for the most part fair and reasonable, although prone to getting a bit carried away.
If we reward the hateful by giving it wider distribution and frequency, what motivation is there to strive to achieve the remarkable?
Last year, Sean Cummins called for an end to anonymous comments at Mumbrella 360 last year. I ranted on about the need for positivity in a previous post. This year the outcome of the Change One Thing session was an attempt to become more courageous as an industry, to combat the “culture of conservatism” - to take risks, something which other commenters have claimed is hampered by the hostility of anonymous threads on sites such as this one.
I’m not seeing a reduction in these social media backlashes directed against an individual; in fact I’d argue that a behaviour that used to be somewhat in the minority is spreading to the mainstream, and every single time consumer affairs shows and broadsheets cover these stories they inflate the propensity of otherwise reasonable people to vent spleen.
So if you, like me, would like not to read any more articles like this one, stop reading articles like this one.
Cathie McGinn
Online trading is the next big thing says Rob Atkinson in a piece that first appeared in
Is the best way of being successful in Australia not be here at all? In a feature that first appeared in
From journos to ad execs and PRs, these days everyone seems to have a book in them. But what does it take to get published and will you actually make any money? In a feature that first appeared in
In an article that first appeared in
From dressing the part to playing the gatekeeper, Leo Burnett Sydney’s Susie Henry tells us how to make it as the face of adland in a piece that first appeared in 
Government funding bodies are lazy and decadent, says industry veteran Michael Thornhill but in a piece that first appeared in
Life is sweet for freelance writer Max Kitchen, but in a feature that first appeared in
First there was the Grand Prix. Next came the reported $500m bid for cricket rights, then Ten secured the 2014 winter Olympics. So, can sport save the ailing network? In a feature that first appeared in 

Cosmo’s Kate Leaver tells us how to bluff it in her job in a feature that first appeared in
Hi Chris,
Brett Clegg, group director – business media, Fairfax Media, in a Q&A that first appeared in 

Comments
12 Jun 12
2:15 pm
I’d pay money to watch a Pay per View of Grimshaw and Reines go toe to toe in the UFC Octagon. Maybe with weighted handbags.
12 Jun 12
2:38 pm
She made the one big mistake of teh internets: she fed the trolls.
12 Jun 12
2:47 pm
If they don’t bring attention to it, how am i supposed to know what to ignore??
12 Jun 12
5:21 pm
More Art and Music in the curriculum would help to re-balance containerised thinking . . methinks.
12 Jun 12
8:12 pm
Good piece. And you’re right. Cars don’t kill people. Rappers do.