Advertisers should stop funding Facebook and start funding real journalism
The Guardian's relentless pursuit of Facebook in the face of potential lawsuits is the kind of thing advertisers should be funding, argues NewsMediaWorks CEO Peter Miller.
I’ve long been a fan of The Guardian newspaper, an admiration elevated in recent times by the paper’s dogged pursuit of Facebook and its failures regarding the private data breaches by Cambridge Analytica. These abject failures have thankfully now been dragged into the white light of public and governmental scrutiny.
Since then, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has had to put his day job on hold as he attends one after another government inquisition on both sides of the Atlantic to defend Facebook’s record and promote its prosed remedies. He has at times been apologetic, often declaring “we must and will do better”.
Stock analysts have been busy at times marking down the stock and then marking it back up as they bet on advertiser’s continued support for the platform.
One is reminded of the firebrand NSW Premier Jack Lang’s advice: “In any race always back the horse called self-interest”.
Given the gross, serial failures of Facebook and its subsequent admissions, which included admitting to the fact that The Guardian had actually understated the scale of Facebook’s betrayal of an estimated 87 million global citizens, you’d imagine there might be a few questions asked by advertisers who after all fund the platform.
There were a celebrated few who announced their withdrawal of advertising from Facebook. Elon Musk generated some publicity for Tesla. So too did Sonos; Mozilla and Commerzbank. No doubt there were some hard conversations, but that nag called self-interest probably came roaring down the straight right at the end.
Of course, great newspapers toil away as did the Guardian for over a year, whilst being threatened with lawsuits by the now defunct Cambridge Analytica and Facebook, to bring wrongdoing to light. And great newspapers, when they are onto a big story, keep running with it until it’s done.
And so it was last week The Guardian revealed that Facebook had announced in its first quarterly Community Standards Enforcement Report that it had closed 583 million fake accounts. Since January.
You’re probably thinking this is a misprint. I mean, Facebook is thought to have 2.1 billion users globally. Surely it cannot be that more than 25% of them were fake?
Perhaps this news is enough to stimulate some advertiser discussions with their media agencies about Facebook, and whether they might be better off directing that 25% of their advertising budgets to more trustworthy media, like the newspapers who relentlessly originate well researched public interest news content for actual readers.
Peter Miller is CEO at NewsMediaWorks.
Couldn’t agree more on The Guardian’s steadfast and dogged pursuit of organisations with misguided view on their morals obligations towards privacy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_International_phone_hacking_scandal#The_Guardian_July_2009_reports
User ID not verified.
Thanks, Peter.
I had a magazine advertiser tell me the other day they were directing all their budget to Facebook advertising now. I was astonished to hear that, given everything we’ve heard about the ethical abyss in which that corporation operates.
User ID not verified.
I am a great supporter of quality and trustworthy journalism. I am here aren’t I? The problem is eyeballs, who they belong to and the way ads are delivered to them in a fragmented mediascape. Facebook, Instagram et all have the eyeballs, they know exactly who they belong to and they deliver ads with some degree of targeting (sometimes very precise targeting) to those eyeballs.
So it’s all very good and well asking advertisers to search their innermost feelings and make an ethical decision to invest elsewhere based on FB’s misdeeds, but you’d have more chance of a herd of rabid camel swan-diving through the eye of my grandmother’s knitting needle than for enough advertisers to abandon a platform en masse where their audience is and to make a discernable difference to either Facebook’s bottom line or the long term prospects of ‘trusted’ news media.
User ID not verified.
For niche mags I disagree about the eyeballs. If I could afford to do a print run I would (as against the current interactive PDF) as ALL subscribers without question prefer print. They have told me so.
I have the eyeballs. Just not the advertisers to pay for the physical print run.
I know exactly where they are getting their advice (vendors I mean) that digital is “better”….
User ID not verified.
The Guardian is, indeed, an amazing example of a truly outstanding journalistic organisation.
It’s just a shame that most of the members of Peter Miller’s organisation would cheer if it went out of existence, lobbied the government to deny it access to funding because it’s a “foreign organisation” (as opposed to the millions handed to American owned Foxtel with no democratic oversight), and all because they don’t like its politics.
Australian news organisations are their own worse enemies, sniping at each other like two bald men arguing over who used to own a comb.
User ID not verified.
Advertisers will put their money where they feel they can get the best return on their investment and its up to more traditional news outlets like the Guardian to demonstrate their platform has an engaged audience that retains information, rather than a distracted audience that pumps out views & likes. In order to do that they need to show they are a trusted source.
Unfortunately Mainstream media keeps shooting itself in the foot. Coverage of Obama, Trudeau, Trump and Brexit for example, has been lovestruck, teenagecrushlike, hostile and myopic in that order. It’s no wonder that comedians and bloggers are increasingly being viewed as new 4th estate – challenging people in power and representing the views of the people.
For too long journalists have focused on meeting deadlines and other logistics of the job, which bloggers can now do cheaper and with a lot less fuss. What makes journalists special is that they are trained (or should be trained) to find the real story, get to the truth and write it without getting their employers put in jail. Recently graduated journalists seem to understand that, so it’s now up to media owners like the Guardian to start backing themselves before they start wagging their fingers at the advertisers they would like to have as clients.
User ID not verified.
That horse has bolted.
Indeed the fact that one paper (funded by a trust as its ad revenue is not enough) uncovered it while the rest of the commercial print world was peddling clickbait and celebrity stories underscores this.
Its this cycle, there is little quality journalism because there is little advertising funding, but on the other side of that coin – there is little advertising because there is little quality journalism.
Somewhere along the line newspapers decided to go the clickbait/cheap article route rather than long-form, meaningful investigative journalism. This meant that they got more eyeballs – but these were (classist comment warning) they eyeballs of people with little spending power – and therefore of little interest to advertisers.
I suspect this solution is too late but having a decently funded publication which funded decent journalism could be pitched to advertisers easier “Our audience is better educated and wealthier/more powerful so its worth the advertising”….maybe it would work. Worth a try innit?
Some will argue that both the Australian and the Guardian do proper investigative journalism (and its true that they do) but because of their clear lack of impartiality they lose more than half the potential audience (some because they are ideological enemies of the paper’s editorial bent, some because they simply can’t take a biased paper seriously). So no, I don’t thinks its been tried yet.
User ID not verified.
Peter, are you an impartial source?
The second the Guardian and co. give me an ad suite half as good as Facebook’s happy to have the discussion. FB may not have as engaged an audience or content, but they know how to add value to advertisers with brilliant tools and tech to help you get results.
On Facebook we never measure through ‘brand’ metrics. Just chuck those conversion pixels down and watch the CPA. Much more accurate and reliable metric.
User ID not verified.