Good governance: What does the ‘more saleable’ Malcolm Turnbull need to do to improve government comms?
Malcolm Turnbull has pledged communications from his government will be “seeking to persuade rather than seeking to lecture”. Miranda Ward spoke to lobbyists and political consultants about what went wrong for Tony Abbott and what we can expect to see from the new Prime Minister.
It is probably quite telling that Malcolm Turnbull used his first speech after the spill last night to pledge a new communications style for the government. The former lawyer and media player is well-known for being very quotable – but what is the role of good communications when it comes to government?
Susan Redden Makatoa, Ogilvy Public Relations group managing director of corporate and lobbyist, told Mumbrella: “This is about, to coin a cliche, true two-way engagement, it’s not about lecturing from the rooftops and that’s where people fell down.
“I noticed there was a lot of buzz on Twitter last night around slogans and one words and jokes about the boats, which shouldn’t be joked about, but that’s what they were tying to the Tony Abbott time. There was some commentary that Malcolm Turnbull didn’t repeat himself, repeat himself, repeat himself.
“People have actually cottoned on to some of those tactics which didn’t sit well. Where, not just this government but other governments in Australia, have struggled it’s about the conversation and reacting and I know Malcolm Turnbull spoke last night about [New Zealand PM] John Key.
“John Key has pushed a reform agenda, explained what he was trying to do, got support and put some tough reforms through. In Australia I would point to [NSW Premier] Mike Baird as somebody who has done that extraordinarily well.”
Effective communication
Marketer and political strategist Toby Ralph was in agreement, saying: “The trick of political leadership is not big ideas or smart strategy; it lies in being able to explain where you propose taking the country, and getting as many people as possible to take a step in the same direction. It’s that leadership narrative that was missing with Tony Abbott.
“People knew what Tony Abbott stood against, but not what he stood for. He’s was strong on negatives, weak on positives because no vision was outlined,” he said.
“Yes, he axed the tax, yes he stopped the boats – but what did he want to start and where did he want to take us? The narrative was lost.”
Ralph, who has also previously worked for the Liberal Party, said “a leader needs a decent explicable plan and a relationship with the media to do this well”.
“Tony Abbott was voted in – or more accurately Rudd was kicked out – because of an emerging economic mess and a Government that was spending almost $150m a day more than it was raising. But Mr Abbott and Mr Hockey seem to have thrown in the towel on that as they were still squandering $95m a day more than taxes allow and complaining about revenue shortfalls rather than spending addictions,” he said.
“Robb, Bishop and Morrison led achievements for the Abbott Government, but many of the rest were pretty pedestrian.”
On the Prime Minister designate Ralph said he’s a more “saleable candidate”.
“Malcolm Turnbull is economically to the right and socially to the left and a very accomplished communicator. He’s a much more saleable candidate – assuming he doesn’t let his brilliance prevent the delegation and trust of colleagues that’s imperative to success in the job,” Ralph said.
“Quite apart from his saleability, Turnbull had to be elected as not doing so would lead Labor to use his challenge speech as their next election campaign,” he added.
The social story
Bastion S+GO director of government relations Sean Sammon expressed surprise in the lack of noise on social media from Liberal MPs.
For Robyn Sefiani, managing director of Sefiani Communications Group, Turnbull’s announcement was “perfectly executed change communication”.
“He clearly stated why change was needed, how he would lead that change through his different leadership style and what the benefits would be for Australia and its people,” she said.
“As a communicator, I found his choice of ‘persuade’ interesting, as many might view the concept of persuasion in a negative light. However it is part of Turnbull’s strong belief that to undertake hard reform you need explanation and healthy debate to enable Australians to understand the need for change, embrace it and move forward with the government’s view.
“This is markedly different from, as he said, Tony Abbott’s leadership style of captain’s calls and lack of consultation.”
Edelman’s head of public affairs Nic Jarvis agreed, saying Turnbull showed “what an effective communicator he is” when declaring his bid to become PM to media yesterday afternoon.
“Turnbull has a big job in front of him, but he is one of the most effective communicators in the government, able to explain complex issues so everyone understands. There’s no denying Australia has big challenges which need to be met with clear and confidence-inspiring plans that instil optimism.
On what the change in leader could mean for lobbyists, Ogilvy PR’s Redden Makatoa was confident many ministers and staffers will remain unchanged.
“Effective advocacy is about finding the common purpose, you can’t just come in and bang the table and say this is what I want, give to me, you’re going to get short thrift.
“If you sit down across a table and this is about engagement, and say this is what I understand your policy direction is and this is what we think fits well with that and this is the benefit that will bring or this is the dreadful alternative we avoid, that’s where it becomes effective advocacy,” she said.
Miranda Ward
Related:
- Malcolm Turnbull might believe in media reform, but not before the next election
- Rich dude becomes PM: How the media covered Turnbull’s ascension
here’s a tip for Malcom from someone who’s spent 15 years talking Australains into changing behaviour.
Have the spine to get what you want to stand for down to one word. Not the fresh, tasty and friendly food people — just the fresh food people.
The Liberals one word has been “patronising”.
Malcolm’s one word should probably be “confident.”
It may turn out to be “deluded” when he discovers Australians aren’t interested in sitting and listen to explainations about why heis party is doing stuff.
Maybe it’s the climate, but the thing to realise about Australians – is they have a short attention span and basically don’t give a shit.
User ID not verified.
policies that will benefit the greater Australian society. Address and improve societies needs and stop serving the wants of big business.
I would vote for a nodding dog if it meant improving our society. Turnbull is the face of the same party. #stillpoweredbymurodchginaandthelike
User ID not verified.
Avoid abstract jargon like “engagement” and “communication” . Speak and write in plain English. Use simple words most people grasp.
User ID not verified.
It’s really quite simple………same shit , different shovel!! But at least a shovel that can string two words together and the country doesn’t cringe when he opens his mouth!!
User ID not verified.
I wonder if Crosby or Textor will be in the loop.
User ID not verified.
Garry Grant is so right. I’m a rusted on Liberal but I used to cringe ever them Abbott opened his mouth as I wondered which food would go into it first. I wouldn’t vote for Labor under any circumstances but his gaucheness had me considering it. And the sad thing is that he was always so desperately unpopular…he wasn’t actually voted IN; rather, his appalling opponents were voted out. That’s why he never had a chance. So now we have to see what the leftist show pony and his glib communication ‘style’ can do. Yike!
User ID not verified.
Well there I was being all inspired by the talk the hope of being innovative, agile,and adaptive………embracing the disruptive nature of the 21st century as my friend……..thinking that maybe, just maybe the new shovel was possibly going to shovel a more redemptive type of shit…………when!!!!
OMG……….the paradigm suddenly came crashing down……….my renewed idealism was dashed on the brutal shores of SCOMO!!!!!!
Yes……….be lectured at right now by The NEW Treasurer on a mission to turn back the budget!! Thats right!! We have a SPENDING problem………not a REVENUE and a SPENDING PROBLEM!!! Just a SPENDING PROBLEM!! Got it!!!
So much for any taking note of the experts like Ken Henry who a few days ago remarked that the problem is about 50/50. Let’s just all get ready for more cuts to education, health, social services,and renewable energy initiatives while the revenue side of superannuation, negative gearing, capital gains tax and fossil fuel subsidies are OFF THE TABLE!!
So……..it looks like I am still at my original thesis……….same shit………different shovel!!
Quite disappointing actually, but not really surprising!!
User ID not verified.