Foxtel rebrands and officially launches Foxtel Now after conceding brand was seen as ‘aggressive’
Foxtel is attempting to reposition as a brand and content platform for everyone, “not just the privileged few”, with new logos, branding and the official launch of streaming service Foxtel Now.
Conceding that the brand’s previous logo with big block capital letters and burnt orange colouring was “almost like when someone sends you a text message all in capital letters”, Foxtel CEO Peter Tonagh said the brand had been seen as “quite aggressive, quite arrogant, quite elitist” for some time.
The new branding – created in collaboration with design agency Maud – which rolls out on Sunday with a national advertising campaign by TBWA, including a wrap around all News Corp papers, has removed the capitalisation, with “the key message being that Foxtel is for everyone”, Tonagh said.
Managing director of customer and retail Mark Buckman said the rebrand marked an important day in Foxtel’s history, as it moved away from its legacy issues.
“For the first time in 22 years, we’re going to be going to market with a very different looking Foxtel,” he said. “But when you think about all of the great content, all of the great technology changes, the launch of the IP product, we almost have to take a different position to market.
“And as PT [Peter Tonagh] said, one of the things that we’ve dealt with over the last little while has been at Foxtel there has been a very masculine, very shouty, retail capital letters kind of brand. And that served us well for quite a long time, but with all of these changes in the industry and going on inside Foxtel, in order for people to think, feel and speak differently about us, we have taken the move to reimagine what Foxtel might be.”
The new, less masculine and aggressive branding, he said, was part of Foxtel’s efforts to appeal to more people and become a more relatable and accessible product and brand.
“At the heart of that is the fact that we believe that great content, and the great content that we have from Australia and around the world, shouldn’t be reserved for the right of the privileged few, but should be at the heart of it available for everybody.”
This, he said, extends beyond the subscription-based television services’ content offering – and would be reflected in the company’s culture and dealings with customers.
“A brand is much more than a logo and a word mark. It’s about every experience and every interaction that our customers have with us – whether it’s the way that we speak to our customers in our call centres, so the language will be fresh, approachable, direct, simple, as opposed to long conversations that can go on forever,” he said, noting that this also applied to how technicians installed IQ boxes, the company’s sponsorship deals and “of course the way we treat each other as colleagues inside the company”.
Foxtel Now
Today also marked the official launch of Foxtel Now, the company’s streaming service which comes about after rumours of the demise of the Foxtel Play brand.
Tonagh said despite perceptions players such as Netflix had a better movie selection, and that Stan heavily invested in original content, Foxtel’s offering was strong and its content unparalleled.
“There is no doubt in my mind that our most core strength is around content,” he said. “And I think we have over many years we have built up a position where we have enviable level of content.”
Foxtel, he said, needed to spruik its content proposition to consumers more effectively, so they know what they’re getting in an age where competition, content and service offerings are increasing.
“Those days [where we have purely exclusive content] have gone because clearly there is now much more competition. There is more content that is available. And what that leads us to is a need to really double down on the content that we think really makes a difference to our subscribers and spend more on that, while spending less on other content. I think in the nature of that, it’s probably worth noting that each year, we spend over $1.6 billion on content. If you think about it, that’s 16 times what Fairfax and Nine said they were going to invest in Stan. So it’s a massive investment. For us it’s not a question of needing to spend more money on content, it’s a question of how do we spend that money to get the best value out of it?”
Delivering this content to audiences who want it will be Foxtel’s key focus, he said – not chasing down pirates who access it by other means.
“Despite everyone focusing on my personal passion for piracy and focusing on court cases and other things, the most important thing for us is not about taking people to court for piracy, it’s about making the product accessible in a timely basis at an affordable cost. That’s the first step. After that then we focus on education, thirdly we focus on court cases. But really, making that content accessible is the most important thing,” he said.
Explaining how Foxtel Now stands apart from the soon-to-be defunct Foxtel Play, the company said: “Foxtel Now is a new evolution of the Foxtel Play streaming service and features low-priced and flexible bundles that ensure subscribers have greater freedom and access to sign up to Foxtel’s incredible content with no set-up costs and the ability to cancel at any time.
“Foxtel Now arrives with the widely anticipated addition of HD streaming on select devices, combined with a brand new user interface, plus the ability to stream Foxtel Now to the big screen via Google Chromecast.”
Tonagh said the time was right to relaunch the streaming service.
“Over the past few months we’ve introduced some fantastic new changes to our subscription streaming service including lowering the entry point to $10 per month and launching on Telstra TV. As part of the evolution of our streaming service, we felt the time was perfect to relaunch the service as Foxtel Now.
“Foxtel Now represents our most flexible and affordable entertainment service and brings with it HD streaming, a great new look and feel and the freedom to jump in and out based on your viewing preferences.”
Bye bye baby.
Bye bye bath water.
Strategic challenge: Be more like competitors. Fine. Be less differentiated. But don’t Bess DISTINCTIVE.
I would have thought at the very least there would be some recognition of existing memories and brand assets in the new brand. Sadly not.
Orange?
Fox / Telstra heritage?
21st Century Fox management?
Anything that might remind a punter of the decades of branded memories?
Abstract dots?
This will make it harder for people to recognise the brand and recall it. If it’s about being less distinctive, then they’ve succeeded. Poor strategy.
User ID not verified.
Rather get an all caps text than an all red one
User ID not verified.
I ditched Foxtel a couple of years ago for two reasons:
1. The price was ridiculous … I got better stuff on Netflix for 1/5 the price
2. Murdoch … never giving another cent to that parasite.
User ID not verified.
But Peter you’ve gone and deleted 19 channels and these are channels that a lot of people love while not reducing the price to match this reduction. Now if one want to watch BBC World News, CNN or CNBC you’re either forced to get a satellite dish bolted to your roof or go to the opposition like Fetch which I think a lot of people will do, a very poor decision with very little thought.
User ID not verified.
Kudos to Foxtel for lowering the bar to legally accessing popular HBO content, but this is till just another substandard streaming offering from Foxtel intentionally crippled to avoid cannibalising their ‘premium’ cable/satellite product.
While Stan and Netflix boast an extensive 1080p Full HD catalogue and a growing but admittedly niche collection of 4K Ultra HD content, we’re supposed to get excited about Foxtel’s 720p “HD lite” and the removal of several channels from the old Foxtel Play lineup?
User ID not verified.
Who signed this off???
User ID not verified.
This is what happens when you get an ad agency to do the branding
Maud=Monkeys
User ID not verified.
Yeah they might be spending $1.6bn in content but it’s not going to be the bulk of content for Foxtel Now…
User ID not verified.
I am the only one who sees this as phallic? Less masculine? I think not ?
User ID not verified.
That logo is really bad. The marque is terrible and the font is horrible. Whoever approved this is going to get fired in the morning.
User ID not verified.
Really?!? This sort of rubbish gives marketers a bad name. Based on this logic Netflix should be really struggling. What a load of branding BS. Seriously people fix the product, the price and service experience… then you might realise it’s got nothing to do with uppercase vs lowercase.
User ID not verified.
The logo looks like an arrow pointing down, then I don’t get the whole lower case font, going from one extreme to the other end of the spectrum makes no sense.
Haven’t the agencies learnt about this drastic shift in brand look that they don’t usually last anymore than 3 or 5 years?
User ID not verified.
So getting rid of 19 channels on Foxtel Play (As of yesterday), changing the name to “Foxtel Now” , yet charging the same price ?? Is some sort of make over ??? Smoke and mirrors, Smoke and mirrors. Your paying the same price with less channels. What Great Change???
More like trying to play catch up in tech/consumer choice to it’s competition.
User ID not verified.
The day before yesterday’s product
Only the technically and Intellectually challenged would even be interested in Foxtel
It’s in a death spiral – good bye ….. and take Citizen Murdoch with you
User ID not verified.
Hilarious! Still charging way too much for delivering way too little and, as always, you’re way too late! And as if we’re suddenly going to find you less aggresive, less arrogant and less elitist just because a chosen few indulged themselves in a fancy font party back at HQ – YOU’RE OWNED BY RUPERT MURDOCH, FOR GOD’S SAKE! (sorry, you’re right, that could have been a little less shouty, perhaps, maybe even lower case all round just to relieve some of the blunt force trauma people might continue to suffer in dealing with Foxtel!) Sheer hubris, nothing less – which, of course, we’ve come to expect throughout all these wearisome years. So, anyway, keep reimagining then, it’s all you’ve got left for those lonely days ahead.
User ID not verified.
Amazing. Here I was thinking all along that Foxtel was losing subscribers due to its high prices, poor customer service, inconvenient installation requirements, low picture quality and inability to choose what channels to purchase. Turns out I was mistaken and Foxtel are losing customers because of their aggressive logo, despite their main competitor also having a logo in all caps and a bright colour…
Despite this, I would actually sign up if I could just buy the sports package by itself. However, Foxtel seems to think the inconvenience of catering to customers like me is not worth the money I’d otherwise happily pay.
User ID not verified.
Yeah, that’ll fix it!
It was the branding! Thank god they changed the logo!
That’s why everyone was leaving FOXTEL in droves (oops… foxtel). Because it was masculine, shouty, and… retail aggressive… yeah!
Definitely not the ads every 4 minutes. Hour plus hold times on the phone. Lacklustre product and service offerings. No actual HD. Insane price difference. Lock-in contracts with crazy fees. Installation costs with crazy fees.
Yeah! Thank god the logo is now lowercase! Less shouty!
User ID not verified.
I live alone. Foxtel is my best friend. It’s my companion. It’s my entertainment. I don’t mind if the Foxtel logo looks a little different. As long as Foxtel is there when I get home tonight I am happy.
User ID not verified.
Woolworths has lasted.
User ID not verified.
It’s not the brand that’s aggressive it’s the business and ruthless culture. New small caps logo ain’t going to change that.
User ID not verified.
You missed the last part of the press release. It’s okay though I’ll summarise it:
“While our branding has changed, customers can be reassured that Foxtel will continue to offer the same over priced packages that they’re accustomed to. Treating our customers like idiots has been, and will continue to be, the cornerstone of our business. This is something we at Foxtel are incredibly proud of. We have also continued to reinvest in content and discovered new ways to separate programming across multiple channel packs so customers have the added flexibility of paying us more for less. “
User ID not verified.
I think Mumbrella and all its armchair experts bagged Stan when it launched too – name too weird, too abstract, too bogan, too Australian, too whatever. Settle experts. Breathe a little.
User ID not verified.
I feel dumber for reading this rationale – I am sure when it was being pitched it came with a side of lubricant.
Can we move away from the wank and just say – our logo needed a refresh?
And I don’t really buy it regardless. Foxtel built its proposition around male sport – rugby league, AFL, football/soccer, union, US sports (NFL, baseball) and programming like GoT, The Walking Dead, True Blood et al – typically targeted to the XY chromosome. Unless the channels build in more Morgan Fairfchild and Melissa Gilbert telemovies, re-runs of Charmed, Dynasty and the Aaron Spelling back catalogue, then I suspect it will continue to appeal to men, most of who, could care less about a less aggressive font.
User ID not verified.
this was the required repositioning that Mr Buckman needs to create his story and platform and move on to bigger things
User ID not verified.
When clients confuse “brand” with “business”, misguided rebrands like this happen.
“Our brand is losing share! We have a brand problem”.
“Well, let’s fix the brand… via a complete re-brand”.
Client isn’t addressing the real problem… and making yourself less easy-to-find/mentally available at this moment in time may prove to be a significant mistake.
If I was Netflix, Stan, Fetch, and even Amazon, I’d smell blood in the water…
User ID not verified.
When you use your all caps logo as a reason for the business not performing you must be clutching at straws.
I’m a long time Foxtel subscriber and what is important is value for money. In 2017 there are plenty of content options to fill the limited hours in a day I can consume media. When the value is gone so will be my subscription especially when it seems I continue to pay more money for the same or less content.
User ID not verified.
The logo made the “quite aggressive, quite arrogant, quite elitist”?!!!
A brand is what you make it. Foxtel’s business practices, pricing and marketing created the aggressive, arrogant & elitist brand image. The logo had sweet FA to do with it!
Pffft.
User ID not verified.
Foxtel isn’t for everyone; a lot of people would rather eat.
User ID not verified.
I am a Foxtel subscriber – but I still had to use a VPN to get the current season of The 100 on Fox8 – because they chose not to show it the same time as the US. This season has already finished – nice one Foxtel. How about instead of changing a logo and giving us HD streaming – which you should have done in the first place – help us to stop hurting you, by playing content when it is available – you are your own worst enemy. You want us to stop pirating and using VPN’s but you give us no choice.
I hope it works for you because I am not a Foxtel hater – but I do have a problem with you saying one thing and delivering something else.
User ID not verified.
seriuosly?? they pay Buckman all this money and what does he actually do? (Edited under Mumbrella’s comment moderation policy)
User ID not verified.
ditto
User ID not verified.
There are huge waves changing the broadcasting landscape. Transparency is abundant and slowly but surely the public are beginning to wake up to the fact that Murdoch owned and operated entities seem to be bullish, arrogant and not user friendly. This appears to be a global trend. The News Of The World had to be shut down. (Remember the phone hacking, including that of a murdered teenagers phone?). Fox News has had sexual predator, after sexual predator marched, (CEO and chief anchor man…), (reluctantly it would seem, because it took them long enough), however it has dented the business in ad revenue. Advertisers do not want to associate their brands with such despicable characters and operations. Lastly Foxtel, the 3rd party that wants to charge enormous amounts and make it ever so hard for you to access content in a ‘modern way’, (aka on any device, whenever you want to). I wont get started on the rest of the News / Fox related businesses.
Ultimately Fox / News Corp/Ltd (whatever they call themselves these days), is under attack by faster, more dynamic and far more user friendly businesses. Secondly, they are under attack by, it would seem, far more ethical and ‘nice’ businesses.
If any of the sentiment above is off course, wrong or spiteful, please sound me out. I often thinks it’s the elephant in the room when I read reporting about why a Murdoch entity is falling over. It seems to me that the years of smearing anything that perpetrates common sense and value to the user / the community / wider society, are coming back to bite these Murdoch businesses, hard. Arrogance and greed throughout any business will eventually lead to it’s demise – can this be the case with the Murdoch empire? Some might say yes? It’s the old staunch conservatism v progression argument and right now in broadcasting and publishing, if you are not progressively inventing, giving the user what they want you are out. User first = win. Murdoch entities seem to put $’s first. I would love to hear another side to this if I am barking up trees.
User ID not verified.
At least it is horizontal. Wouldn’t want a cock-up would we.
User ID not verified.
What. a. load. of. guano.
Bam. Pow. Zap
You’re fired agency.
User ID not verified.
Is it an upside down Southern Cross with the stars in the wrong position?
I subscribe to Foxtel Play. I’ve not received any communication from them on the change to Now and what it means to me or the cancellation of some channels. Last comms was 19th May suggesting programs to watch.
They should have redirected the time invested in branding chat and figured out how to best communicate these changes to existing and new customers.
User ID not verified.
Those dot thingies are very 90s… Foxtel have missed the point. A rebrand isn’t going to fix an overpriced, shit product.
User ID not verified.
Excellent logo to answer a nightmare brief. A nightmare speech to answer an excellent logo!
User ID not verified.
Yeah, because the logo was what was stunting their growth and market share.
You have to give credit where it’s due, whoever the agency was that sold this one in could sell fridges to Eskimo’s.
My favourite, however, is: “Conceding that the brand’s previous logo with big block capital letters and burnt orange colouring was “almost like when someone sends you a text message all in capital letters”
Did anyone point out that Netlix’s logo is also in capital letters? Your logo isn’t the problem guys. THINK.
User ID not verified.
They’re even too scabby to offer a 1 month trial. The trial period is 2 weeks!!
User ID not verified.
I like to laugh alone with salad.
User ID not verified.
Yes, but that was done by a reputable agency. Who’s Maud? What have they ever done that is memorable?
User ID not verified.
I haven’t had one communication from Foxtel ever. Nothing on new boxes, services, x-sell, nothing. Couldn’t market for confefe
User ID not verified.
Better stuff on Netflix……..thats gold!!!! Thanks for the good laugh!
User ID not verified.
Check your account. You are probably opted out.
User ID not verified.
I suspect a number of people will be called to account over this decision once the dust settles. Not only is it an appalling waste of money to rollout it also demonstrates no focus on the bigger issue of subscription numbers and customer dissatisfaction with what is one of the worst TV experiences in the industry – from hardware through to programming, digital services & apps.
It’s like someone thought customer expierence started with a new brand identity. How backward is that in this era?!
User ID not verified.
No. I’m opted in for everything. Never received a single communication in 8 years…
User ID not verified.
+1, indeed… smoke and mirrors isn’t going to fix their product
User ID not verified.
Such epic dribble from news Corp;
http://www.news.com.au/technol.....1b66282728
User ID not verified.
Who cares what it looks like. Service would be great. Don’t sign up with the Telstra/Foxtel deal. Absolute con
User ID not verified.
Foxtel: Just another company that doesn’t understand branding.
User ID not verified.
You have to be kidding with this rebrand. Way to ruin a brand. I hope you paid $10 to get that designed as that is the quality of the work here. Having a design background and having worked in the agency world for many years i find the last few major Australia companies to have done rebranding to be very weak and lacking in true creative vision.
Foxtel’s move to use lower case is so clichéd. I also find it very interesting that part of the drive for the change was to make the brand less masculine surely there are many other colours to choose from then salmon pink. What is with that icon/symbol ……
You can see how literal the creatives took the CEO statement of how the old brand was seen and just went opposite. Upper case to all lower case. Masculine and bold to Feminine light and pink!. Would of loved to have seen the hipster heavy focus group they got into to review this.
As you can tell I for one am not a fan. This is not a strong or unique brand. The colours used should only be seen a wall colour a mental hospital. The icon would fit better being used by game shop with a name that starts with be with a B.
Overall the changes to the brand have gone to far. Loose the icon and take the colours back to the silver and you may just be able to maintain some brand integrity with the new lower case font.
User ID not verified.
I’m surprised Ritson hasn’t labeled this mob clueless as well by not walking in the consumer shoes etc…like he did to media agencies. Oh that’s right, he’s on the News Limited payroll and guess who owns Foxtel.
User ID not verified.
You don’t make friends with salad!
User ID not verified.
Regardless of the reason yiu give fir removing channels from Foxtel Go/Play.. it’s only to firce those viewers to subscribe to your full service.
Fail for Foxtel – again.
I know I will be cancelling my foxtel subscription the day of the last GoT episode, and staying with Netflix and Stan.
Shame on you Foxtel.
User ID not verified.
Orange capitals are aggressive, arrogant, and elitist, but lower case in dotty pinkish red case is not?
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our typeface, but in ourselves.
User ID not verified.
Hello Foxtel Now – Goodbye channels!!!
Why am I suddenly unable to view Lifestyle You and Style as part of the entertainment package? These channels are suddenly locked since the launch of Foxtel Now. No explanation, no solution offered about how to access these channels. Time to reassess my subscription ?
User ID not verified.
It’s gone from looking like an entertainment brand to looking like a low end office supply company.
User ID not verified.
http://bpando.org/2015/10/05/b.....mpression/
User ID not verified.
Suggested tagline “Foxtel Now: Your money still goes to Murdoch”
User ID not verified.
Not a great bit of kerning. But the brand as a whole has legs to be interesting. Look forward to seeing how it progresses.
User ID not verified.
Check out my post on LinkedIn comparing the new foxtel logo to vivino: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6295471584182435840/
User ID not verified.