An open letter to ANZ: Be better
ANZ made a mistake with its 'Love Speech' campaign, argues Paul Scarf in this open letter to the bank. As he says, a marginalised community can reclaim slurs - a corporation can’t.
Dear ANZ,
Thank you for being an ally to the LGBTQ+ community for the past 15 years. Your support in lending your platform and resources to promote equality should be commended. The way you have encouraged openness and diversity within your workplace is admirable.
But your most recent campaign “Love Speech” is one of the most hurtful and triggering campaigns I – as a gay man – and fellow friends who identify as trans, lesbian, queer and bi, have seen in a long time (and that’s saying something considering the onslaught of tone-deaf advertising we endured throughout the same-sex marriage plebiscite).
I’m writing this not to cancel you or shame your campaign. I’m writing this as a plea for you to do better.
I understand you sought views from members of the community on this campaign before launching, but you are dealing with hate speech which is hurtful and dangerous.
Dredging up the hurt caused by these slurs is not a progressive way of supporting a community that has been vilified for centuries.
Let me break it down for you.
Having a piece of advertising that says “TRANS PEOPLE ARE SICK OF BEING SOOOOO FABULOUS” does three things.
Firstly, it revives decades of memories of bullying, non-acceptance, and of the hate that the community still has to put up with on a daily basis.
Secondly, it’s reductive to attempt to create a positive out of something so hateful; promoting a flippant, 2D view of the trans experience in the process. Trans people don’t actually speak like they are on Rupaul’s Drag Race.
And thirdly, you are perpetuating a stigma that already exists in society. Your role as an ally is to help progress the conversation, not add fuel to a damaging narrative that is still prominent today.
Now, onto your video – and I should start by saying that I commend all the individuals in this video for their openness and bravery to reclaim those words.
But having members of the LGBTQ+ community speak the awful, derogatory words that they have been called can give the impression to the general public that these words are acceptable.
Hearing them without any kind of censorship is hurtful and extremely triggering for people who have been bullied and continue to be singled out and alienated by complete strangers on the street.
You have said it yourselves – words hurt. But covering them with emojis or rainbows is a cheap gimmick that does nothing to actually address the cause of the problem.
You know what does address the problem? Lobbying government on anti-bullying programs that help children who are struggling with their identity and sexuality.
The naivety in creating an online glossary to combat hate speech blowing up slurs in HUGE LETTERS is staggering. What homophobic or transphobic person is going to read this and curb their actions?
Walking down Oxford Street, there is a huge billboard that reads BOYS SHOULD NEVER WEAR DRESSES WITHOUT A KILLER PAIR OF HEELS. Do you think an 11-year-old boy struggling with their identity really wants to feel alienated or different?
Who is this campaign targeting? If you want to educate straight cis people about equality, now is not the time. This time of year is about celebrating marginalised people and making them feel welcome. Not reminding them how ‘different’ society views them.
I understand what you are trying to achieve with this campaign, but it does not welcome the LGBTQ+ community or make us feel a sense of pride which we all should be feeling at this time of celebration.
But I think what hurts the most is that there are so many issues this campaign could have promoted – the blueprint was already on the Mardi Gras website. Acknowledgement of First Nations people and culture. Affirming trans and gender-diverse identities. Respect for the pioneers of the past, having the big conversations of today, inspiring the leaders of the future. Shining a spotlight on LGBTQ+ rights across the Asia-Pacific region. Inclusion, empathy, sustainability, belonging.
Out of all these important issues presented on a silver platter for you, you chose to create a campaign that divides.
A marginalised community can reclaim slurs – a corporation can’t.
This campaign has triggered years of being bullied for just being me. But I understand that we all make mistakes. So please ANZ, I implore you to just do better next time.
Thanks,
Paul (a privileged, white, cis, gay male working in media who lives in Sydney and needed to voice my concerns and those of my LGBTQIA+ family)
Paul Scarf is strategy director at Alchemy One
You’re damned if you do and you’re damned if you dont.
Paul – what an absolute whinge fest!!!
I to have spoken with members of the community who absolutely adore this, so no, I don’t think ANZ need to do better.
How about giving them props for consistent support over the years and not drilling down to the minutia of what some trans kid ‘may think’ when they see ANZ’s message?
Sounds like an opportunity for self / agency promotion via a completely fabricated issue.
User ID not verified.
As a fellow gay man in media, I agree completely. I am sick of representation of LGBT+ focusing on a narrative of victimhood and negative connotations. How about treating us as victors, over victims? Normal people as opposed to a freak show? Not all gay men want to wear heels, the vast majority don’t wear heels at all. This campaign is a pale imitation of RuPaul’a drag race. I would ask, take the money from this dire campaign and invest in LGBT+ businesses and show support by booking advertising space in LGBT+ media outlets. ANZ have a large APAC footprint, where are they showing support to LGBT+ in the other pacific countries where homosexuality is outlawed and ANZ is a dominant bank? They are conveniently quiet in those locations. Support for our community has decreased in America due to identity politics, please don’t do that here ANZ – we are normal (boring) humans – not a freak show.
User ID not verified.
We all have opinions
Cool lets talk about how wrong you are and how right I am
User ID not verified.
Dear Media Buyer,
What I think you’re trying to say is:
“I feel attacked by you saying this dredged up trauma from your past because I like the campaign so I’m going to say you’re the problem rather than consider that people interpret messages based on their own experience and that interpretation being different from mine doesn’t mean it’s invalid. I would rather attack you for having a different opinion than mine than accept my own opinion isn’t the be all and end all”
User ID not verified.
You may be right, ‘Media Buyer’ – but posting your quite confrontational comment anonymously does nothing to stimulate a genuine conversation around these issues. Rather, it generates more of the same back-and-forth slagging and slurring that dominates our social media as soon as important issues are raised.
Your “what some trans kid ‘may think'” statement, in particular, is poorly thought-through and smacks of marginalisation.
Paul, as a straight, white, cis guy I don’t have your lived experience. Thank you for sharing your perspective.
User ID not verified.
You have said exactly what I have felt and thought, thank you Paul. Reading the words that have been thrown at my community and I across my life, and seeing it being turned into jovial slang, is not helpful. Thanks for your incredibly supportive work to date, ANZ, but this one isn’t ok.
User ID not verified.
He did give props for consistent support over the years though? He’s totally correct, a marginalised community can reclaim slurs made against them but a corporation does not have the same right.
User ID not verified.
ANZ appears to be doing a lot more in this space than many other major companies yet it’s still not good enough for some people.
User ID not verified.
You’re not ‘damned if you do and damned if you don’t’. If you’re a grown-up professional working in this space you can look at this objectively and say, ‘some people will like it and some will hate it but we should listen to the feedback and learn to make it stronger’. And he did give them props for the support, it’s literally in the first paragraph of the article.
Also – when we’re talking about minority communities, shouldn’t we be drilling down to what they think? And getting marketers to think about the individual as an example within the broader context? It’s not a mainstream topic i.e. mass market. It’s not a bunch of mainstream issues. What is it though, is bigotry and harmful stereotyping that affects a specific group of people in our community. So what they see being said, and the messages individuals take away about their community, does matter and is important.
User ID not verified.
Yikes!
Not sure how Media Buyer, as not a member of the community can comment on this campaign’s impact on the community.
Agree ANZ deserves credit for long term support and having a go but a campaign that at best divides and at worst upsets the community needs to be re-looked at.
Incidentally, anyone noticed that Absolut has a campaign out that takes the positive angle on the same topic?
User ID not verified.
Interesting read.
For what it is worth, I found the video genuine, touching and even a bit empowering. That’s what happens when you pass the microphone to real people from the community with real experiences, made especially powerful with the variety of genders, identities and backgrounds. Though I would admit that other elements of this campaign are a bit tone-deaf and cringeworthy, I put this down to someone feeling the need to turn the camp level to 11 because its Mardi Gras and that’s whats expected (?)
I think that all social campaigns should aim to do better, everytime. Keep their finger on the pulse, ask what they got wrong, update the blueprint for next time.
User ID not verified.
As a straight white male….
…never mind I’ll see myself out.
User ID not verified.
It’s tricky to speak on behalf of any community, especially one with such diversity – but the work ANZ are doing should be commended, not condemned.
Pauly, we COULD say that it’s kind of hypocritical for you to speak on behalf of the whole community too, could we not?
Give them a break – the campaign is here to drive inclusion and its a season of celebration, so crack a smile and try to spread some light instead of criticism.
User ID not verified.
While we’re discussing ANZ campaigns, another minority where they’ve thrown a lot of ad spend is towards disability. Firstly, good work but secondly, PLEASE FIND NEW TALENT! Dylan Alcott is a great guy but he’s not the only person in Australia with disabilities.
User ID not verified.
Totally agree, Paul. I was having the same conversation with some of our team, and they were pretty unimpressed, to say the least.
As one of the team said: “Sorry, apart from making me feel like I’m different to everyone else, how does this help me with my mortgage selection and service”?
User ID not verified.
This brings up a huge conversation that is often missed in marketing – what do brands have the right to speak about, how can they do it in a way that approaches the subject with authority and are there subjects or sub-topics that are simply off the table. As an agency, it’s something that we have to think of on behalf of clients as they often believe their brand is doing the best job of any. Most of the time, the award-winning work pushes the boundaries of what is and isn’t welcome from a brand, but hopefully, the execution pulls it back into line and society welcomes the conversation it brings.
Personally, I think ANZ has done a fantastic job working within the LGBTQ+ space (without being just another brand jumping on board) in the past but I tend to agree with Paul, this might just be one of those subjects that a brand is unable to tackle, or maybe the execution is a tad off. And that is okay too! ANZ is still a supporter of the community, and I assume they still will be through the backlash of their latest campaign.
User ID not verified.
Totally agree. It’s encouraging to see brands like Absolut and ANZ throwing their weight behind messaging like this.
You’re never going to please everyone and unfortunately, it’s just never enough for some (particularly those who claim to speak in behalf of a whole community).
User ID not verified.
This campaign is likely an over stretch from a brand that felt they had more of a right to show up with this language and tone than maybe they do … but in the longer term they’ve demonstrated legitimate sustained effort in this space when it would have been easier and cheaper to leave it alone. As a customer I think the intent is right even if the execution is wrong.
All said through the lens of a middle aged white straight guy.
User ID not verified.
Thanks for reading my “whinge fest” ‘Media Buyer’! Re: ‘props for their consistent support over the years’ please see paragraph 1. I’m happy for you to come for me and my opinion ‘Media Buyer’ but don’t come for a trans kid and even try and imagine their experience when they’re exposed to this.
User ID not verified.
Here here Paul. The fact that LGBTQI+ groups and members raised concerns with this campaign early on but were ignored is abhorrent. The fact that posters are being defaced to read ‘Trans people are sick of being murdered’ speaks volumes about how tone deaf, condescending, and dangerous this campaign is unfolding to those it’s meant to be ‘helping’. Look on Twitter and you’ll see what the queer community really think of this work. Yes ANZ has done incredible work in the past, but this campaign misses the mark in a big way. If this gets awarded by juries, I’ll be very saddened.
User ID not verified.
With you 100% Paul!
User ID not verified.
I completely disagree Paul. Mardi Gras is a civil rights parade. Yes we’ve come a long way since the first march in 1978. But if we don’t continue to stand up for what is right, then we are doing a disservice to the original marchers. Not challenging the hate speech. Not protesting the religious freedoms legislation. Paying out millions to Falou.. We need to call out the name callers. This campaign does exactly this. Which is why I and so many of my queer friends love and applaud this work. We’re not gonna lie down and take it. We’re not going to cover it up in glitter and rainbows. Thank you ANZ for being so bold. And thank you to everyone involved for your bravery. It’s hard to stick your neck out without people trying to slap you down. But We need this to be put on the table. We don’t all have to agree with the approach. But words do hurt and this campaign makes a powerful and emotional plea to stop the hate.
User ID not verified.
I like that Paul started by thanking ANZ for their support, because alot of what they have done has been positive and highly visible, certainly more than other banks (to my knowledge).
However, they are also encouraging hurtful and alienating stereotypes and it’s OK for us to tell them how they can do better next year. And I think we can have this conversation without people feeling the need to have an absolute PRO or ANTI sentiment like some of these comments.
User ID not verified.